chris85mcfc said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
But this is Mancini's team, right? ;)
What an incredible benchmark last season really was.
Ferguson clearly lost the plot after his bastards did the Treble back in 1999.
£130 million net spend since Mancini has left tho mate
And still 8 of the players in our best 11 were part of the core that Mancini left
Hart, Zabba, Vinny, Clichy, Yaya, Silva, Nasri, Sergio, and you could even argue Dzeko
I must have missed Mark Hughes signing Zab and Komps, then?
Mancini left nothing but a dressing-room fallen apart at the seams, players who had continually been told they were shit and needing punching in the face or were liars.
Seems to me, you want it both ways and refuse to give Pellegrini the credit for an incredible achievement, in his first season, where we became the most prolific team in British football history.
The only way is down, unless you expect a £48m cap on spending to be the difference in winning the title again, the League Cup, the FA Cup and Champions League this term.
You've already rightly identified and admitted what the solution is, and Pellegrini knows it too. The signing of Bony will allow him to go 4-4-2 as and when he needs to.
If you and others are using the stick that this isn't Pellegrini's team, then surely he should be afforded the same luxury as Mancini and Hughes, who combined, were allowed to spend over £500m.
The financial landscape has changed beyond recognition since we first started spending.
How much do we think Silva and Aguero would cost now?
Try £120m and upwards.
That is the context people have to work with when they start throwing names about who we should have signed.
Manual gets plenty wrong, and some of his subs absolutely stink of naivety or panic.
Plenty felt Mancini could be admonished of blame because his hands had been tied in the market, off the back of a title win.
Pellegrini, seemingly, not.