foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Probably for the same reason Brighton didn't, seeing as they signed him from GetafeThey make a good point. Why didn't WE sign him from Barcelona if we thought he was that good. ( Oops forgot we had Mendy).
Probably for the same reason Brighton didn't, seeing as they signed him from GetafeThey make a good point. Why didn't WE sign him from Barcelona if we thought he was that good. ( Oops forgot we had Mendy).
Wonder if City are letting Brighton get a replacement in before its announced, believe we did similar with Jack & Villa.I think this one will drag on.
Brighton fans are right. He has a long contract and a chairman who will stick to a price.
Up to City to meet it. It won’t be cheap and it probably will be 50m.
With City having Cancelo and Zinchenko at LB it’s not a signing that’s as important as replacing Fernandinho, hence the Phillips deal done quicker.
I see this maybe even going to deadline day.
Cucurella is going to have to force this if he wants it. If he does it will likely happen and maybe Zinchenko leaving late in the window as well if it does.
Focus on another target. It would last till the end of August.
Focus on another target. It would last till the end of August.
Focus on another target. It would last till the end of August.
No they’re not. He is their player and we can’t just point at him and say (Little Britain style) “I want that one!”Dont bother theirs better out there, just taking the piss now
Look at th source
Stone, the rag muppet who works for bbc, he's about as reliable as Delaney quoting 60m for Phillips