Kamaro011
Well-Known Member
And why?, they (Brighton) doesn't want to be club where they develop player from another club. They want a permanent move to even consider a player they can get for lowering price for Cucurella.
- Status
And why?, they (Brighton) doesn't want to be club where they develop player from another club. They want a permanent move to even consider a player they can get for lowering price for Cucurella.
Dribble
Well-Known Member
Of course Manchester City Football Club need the money! Have you forgotten about our FFP woes already? :-|
We're not a charity, but as in the case of Zinchenko, we're a business with a heart. We made a £30m profit on squad player Zinchenko & facilitated his move to a huge London based club, managed by our former manager.
It's a win win deal which benefitted City & Zinchenko, & Arsenal got a fantastic player who it now turns out was a lifelong fan.
Brighton firm over Cucurella price amid Man City pursuit
Brighton have strengthened their resolve to keep Marc Cucurella unless Manchester City meet their asking price for the Spanish defender.City's opening...
theathletic.com
Unless City pay the 50m (with add-ons works) this is a Kane 2.0 situation.
A player that his club does not want or need to sell and is under a long contract, so we either pay or go.
Jokithedruid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2012
- Messages
- 981
I’m not flapping anymore, Zin who is TH’s brother have set a deadline on the deal (he will be ours before the charity shield).
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 27,790
we`ll know soon enough as if we walk, our trusted press pack will get the heads up and thats not happened yet.
Not the best news to wake up to. Just hope we sign a lb if cucurella doesn’t happen. Can’t believe some posters are seemingly ok with us going into next season with 2 full backs.
Can only think they missed the champions league semi and the villa first half. Losing Walker nearly cost us the league and it did the champions league imo
- Status