What I don't get is 16 out of 20 PL clubs voted for, or abstained on a version of FFP with an eye on stopping City. The majority accuse us of ruining football by buying every player with a detectable pulse, & paying the equivalent of the UK's national debt in wages.
The fact that until 12 months ago Arsenal, Chelsea, Dippers & the Rags ALL had higher record purchases than City was lost on most.
We've identified Cucu as a possible acquisition, have made our interest known & have offered to double Brighton's profit 12 months after they bought him.
But no! They want over TREBLE what they paid for him a year ago & yet it's other clubs accusing City of ruining football? :-|
If offering a fair price & selling at fair prices is ruining football, then why isn't the blatant profiteering from a player who wants to leave?
Why aren't the press accusing Brighton of bringing inflation into the transfer market & ruining football?
Why does this only ever seem to apply to City? )(