Mid Wales blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,764
.What he meant was you can but if you do you’re a ****
;-)
.What he meant was you can but if you do you’re a ****
Well done 10/10.
;-)
Greenwood was said to be in trouble last year over some inappropriate behaviour, which never came to light.
The latest incident has people asking if they might be related and what knowledge his club might have had, if any?
That’s what my wife calls me.What he meant was you can but if you do you’re a ****
I guess it depends what his lawyer has instructed him to say.It will be very simple for the police. They will have asked him the question if it is his voice on the recording?
Greenwood has a dilemma whichever way he responds.
I don't know how they can expect anything else though. Everyone was offering their opinions on Harvey Weinstein once his behaviour was made public.I've been saying just this for some time now. I note that the Independent is carrying a piece today which makes clear the risks of people continuing to post opinions on the case on social media platforms.
That Reddit post doing the rounds form last year saying he had 'domestic' issues that the papers were sitting on suggest that the club knew. If the papers do then the club will.
He also suggested they were sitting on stories about a Liverpool player but thats still quiet.
Lets face it most clubs will try to keep this stuff under wraps due to the value of players, especially if its a 'big' player
I guess it depends what his lawyer has instructed him to say.
Have you seen What’s up, Doc?, it was a classic of its time.What he meant was you can but if you do you’re a ****