Have we?I actually think he has a ‘bit’ of de Jong about him. Which will not hurt us one bit. We’ve missed that aspect of the game since Ferns departure.
Have we?I actually think he has a ‘bit’ of de Jong about him. Which will not hurt us one bit. We’ve missed that aspect of the game since Ferns departure.
Personally think it’s too much given his age (29) the position and the club we’re buying from. Not sure I’ve seen anyone else linked to him?
Chelsea sre desperate to move players on and “balance” the books and he has one year left on his current contract.
We are paying approximately 10M less than they paid for a younger, English Sterling last year in similar situation (1 year left and no known other suitors). If it was 20-25M OK, but I don’t think this is great business. Still, as I’m sure I’ll be told, Pep and the transfer team know better than me, so have to trust them on this one.
He's playing in the international mickey mouse final todayFuckin hell isn’t this done yet
Personally think it’s too much given his age (29) the position and the club we’re buying from. Not sure I’ve seen anyone else linked to him?
Chelsea sre desperate to move players on and “balance” the books and he has one year left on his current contract.
We are paying approximately 10M less than they paid for a younger, English Sterling last year in similar situation (1 year left and no known other suitors). If it was 20-25M OK, but I don’t think this is great business. Still, as I’m sure I’ll be told, Pep and the transfer team know better than me, so have to trust them on this one.
On the other hand, can't buy a player of his quality for 35m.
Generally, kind of agree with you in part, City could stretch this out and possibly push it down some £5m (kind of like Chelsea did with Sterling). Might not be worth as much as getting it done early maybe, who knows.
I do sometimes find it intriguing that Tixiki can haggle over 5m for months on end for transfers that are supposedly seen as key according to rumours at times, and at others just pay up when some fans consider it overpriced.
Out of the two reported, I'd rather see him pay Liepzig what they want and get Gvardiol in early, and take the time to 'save' on Kovacic.
And yes the usual 'we have just won the treble, they clearly know what they are doing' etc putdowns apply, it is just discussing opinions.
Chelsea will sign Viega for £35mOn the other hand, can't buy a player of his quality for 35m
Chelsea will sign Viega for £35m
Chelsea will sign Viega for £35m
If they sign anyone it be when they have shipped out sold at least 6 players!
Look at the difference with us we not going to sign anyone till we know where we stand with gundo silva Walker and Laporte! We already have a small exhausted squad to boot!
I hope we sort out incomings out before waiting mate and we always hear that we work a window in advance, because of the World Cup txiki was dealing in December etc and as you say the squad needs depth in areas anyway?
Just expect all outgoings incomings to be dragged out all summer then you won’t be disappointed
Same age as Dinho when he arrived.How long has he got left at the top? 3 years? Can’t see this myself.
Happens to all clubs , expect this summer to be quicker though with an early start to next season. No tournaments so most players will finish internationals this week and want to sorted if they can.That normally happens with our sales doesn’t it? Lol
Happens to all clubs , expect this summer to be quicker though with an early start to next season. No tournaments so most players will finish internationals this week and want to sorted if they can.
Dinho was 28, Kovacic is 29.Same age as Dinho when he arrived.
So you’re saying we may only get 8, rather than 9 years out of him?Dinho was 28, Kovacic is 29.
Haha some people seem to think we still live in the 90s and that footballers are finished at the age of 32So you’re saying we may only get 8, rather than 9 years out of him?