Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
The fact he wants to play center midfield and feels by end of next season he will be on the edges of the first team as we grow. wih Gerard gone he will get his wish as he was nowhere near good enogh to break in to our first, why has hart never wanted to leave or aguero or silva, kompany the list goes on of truly talented players that obviously feel the agenda isnt hampering them. Alot of people said he same thing of Tevez lacking ambiion when he joined us (diffrent I know but I has some relevance)
The fact he wants to play center midfield and feels by end of next season he will be on the edges of the first team as we grow. wih Gerard gone he will get his wish as he was nowhere near good enogh to break in to our first, why has hart never wanted to leave or aguero or silva, kompany the list goes on of truly talented players that obviously feel the agenda isnt hampering them. Alot of people said he same jing of
The fact he wants to play center midfield and feels by end of next season he will be on the edges of the first team as we grow. wih Gerard gone he will get his wish as he was nowhere near good enogh to break in to our first, why has hart never wanted to leave or aguero or silva, kompany the list goes on of truly talented players that obviously feel the agenda isnt hampering them. Alot of people said he same thing of Tevez lacking ambiion when he joined us (diffrent I know but I has some relevance)
The fact he wants to play center midfield and feels by end of next season he will be on the edges of the first team as we grow. wih Gerard gone he will get his wish as he was nowhere near good enogh to break in to our first, why has hart never wanted to leave or aguero or silva, kompany the list goes on of truly talented players that obviously feel the agenda isnt hampering them. Alot of people said he same jing of

If he was going to be on the edge of our first team why should anyone be bothered ? Unless he has it written into his contract that he will be picked for every game in central midfield, words are simply meaningless. If he's playing poorly in central midfield will he still get picked ?

The fact are he has chosen a less successful side, without champions league and a team that showed it was on the slide towards the end of the season, over us.

If every player was bothered about a signing on fee then every player would simply let their contracts run down so that argument simpy doesn't wash either.

As for our other star players who have committed themselves to the club, the agenda against us is certainly less pronounced in other parts of the world than in the UK and all our other star players are getting regularly picked for their national side and no doubt getting the recognition in their own country their talents deserve.
 
If ever you want an example of why the agenda matters, and the negative impact it has on our beloved City, even if you believe it only extends to a bias in the media and punditry, then the James Milner transfer is one of the best examples in recent times.

The choice for James was pretty stark, one club in the Champions League, offering a huge salary, playing with 'proven' world class players where, despite missing out on a trophy, we were still the highest goalscorers, had the best goal difference, and towards the end of the season were clearly demonstrating our credentials to go on and push for trophy's again, or, another team that finished 7th in the league, offered no champions league and demonstrated abysmal form towards the end of the season conceding SIX against Stoke City in the final game.

Taking the facts, and looking at it from a purely football perspective, it should have been a no brainer, take the team names away and offer that choice to any footballer - just who in their right mind would choose the latter team ? Well James Milner just has done. That despite him being given the additional game time he was promised.

And therein lies the power and negative influence of the agenda against our club. Despite every football reason being in our favour, Milner still saw Liverpool as a more attractive option. Forget the signing on fee, we could have let Milners contract expire and pay him a similar signing on fee. Not only that, he chooses to announce he is leaving over a 'month' before he can officially sign for Liverpool, a further kick in the teeth, that it doesn't even appear to have been a difficult decision for him.

Why under those footballing circumstances could he choose Liverpool over us ? It defies belief, unless you understand the powerful and insidious nature of the agenda, something that Milner must undoubtedly have felt and understood.

I can give you any number of reasons, despite the obvious footballing facts in our favour, why Milner chose the dippers over us:

Continually being overlooked by England in big tournaments despite being a mainstay of a domestic team that has dominated for the last 5 years, ffs, Woy has been selecting Fabian Delph & Cleverley over Milner in more games than I care to mention, take the last game, Henderson, Delph and f*cking Carrick - selected over Milner- by rights on that measure we really shouldn't give two hoots he's leaving - but we all know he's better than all of them - but he still wasn't picked. The World Cup, Milner gets picked in the dead rubber against Costa Rica, Euro Championship campaign Milner largely ignored except for the San Marino game - what an absolute kick in the teeth for a player of his quality.

The total and utter lack of recognition (except by City fans) of Milners achievements despite being a regular and intrinsic part of a premier league Champions team and winner of 4 trophies in 5 years and being in the top two for all 5 seasons

This is probably Milners last big contract, his mind is starting to think about life after football and he knows that being known as a mainstay of a Manchester City team is not going to do him any favours in getting into punditry or media jobs or making his mark in the England team - now he will likely end up serving 5/6 years at Dipperpool his stock post football rises considerably - and Milner is savvy enough to work out that this is how it works in our corrupt game.

Recognition - just you watch now he's playing for the dippers - it will be like the second coming of Gerrard, you mark my words, back in the England team and getting the RECOGNITION that his football talent at City has deserved - he knows he will get this and I know it. F*ck me, he's only just signed and I'm now seeing quotes about more assists than Mata, more Goals than Fabregas - and they've only just announced the signing FFS.

This sh*t matters to people, to players ,being recognised, being loved, lauded, having your talent put out there to the masses. With City, his talent has been hidden under a bushell because the only one's shouting about it are us the City fans.

Milner should have been a mainstay of the England team, the general footballing public should have been talking about his quality but everything he did, everything he contributed to the City team got zero recognition from the mainstream media and pundits. He can't have failed to notice the year we beat the Scousers to the league how the media were lauding Liverpools performances week in and week out - whilst we just went about our business, outscoring them and getting zero accolades.

Look at the Manager of the year awards and Writers player of the year its there in black and white, the agenda laid bare by the complete and utter lack of recognition of our teams talents.

The result, Milner decides that Liverpool, a failing team offers a better option for his career than the blues. Its sickening, it really is.

My genuine hope is that we were happy to let him go, that we saw it as freeing up a place for homegrown talent from the academy but I fear that we did fight to keep him, and lost, despite all the footballing reasons being in our favour.

Wow, just..wow.
 
You're all nuts.

One footballing reason Bluemooner that you asked for is that he'll actually be a first team regular as opposed to a bit part player.

Nothing whatsoever do with the agenda.
 
Clearly we wanted to keep him as a squad player but not as a first team regular hence why he's gone so I wouldn't say we've 'lost' he has just gone to a team that can accommodate him because they are not at the same level we are.

Good luck to him we will move on and get stronger.
 
The point is certain players get picked for England because of the team they play for and the perception of that club. i.e. in recent times Zaha, Cleverley, Walker and Lambert who was picked more times to play for England playing at Liverpool than when at Southampton. Others players seem to be overlooked unless everyone else is injured and even then they sometimes are i.e. Richards who at the time was the best right back in the country but was overlooked by all and sundry
 
The point is certain players get picked for England because of the team they play for and the perception of that club. i.e. in recent times Zaha, Cleverley, Walker and Lambert who was picked more times to play for England playing at Liverpool than when at Southampton. Others players seem to be overlooked unless everyone else is injured and even then they sometimes are i.e. Richards who at the time was the best right back in the country but was overlooked by all and sundry

No, his point was that Milner chose to sign for Liverpool instead of extending with us because of the agenda which is frankly just horseshit
 
If Milner is guaranteed a spot in central midfield every week I'll be happy.

I reckon he'll be on a wing or bench by September.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.