Media persecution of Raheem Sterling

Exactly....its quite poor imo that southgate hasnt verbally stuck up for him in a presser, probably wouldnt want to isolate himself though.
Except that he already has: http://www.skysports.com/football/n...217s-movement-is-crucial-to-this-england-team

Southgate clarified his position prior to the Colombia game, outlining the reasons why Sterling is not only expected to retain his place in England's starting line-up but is actually regarded by those who matter as central to the team's success. "I have great belief in him," he explained. "He has been a really important part of the team.

"In the last five or six games, with the change of system, he has been key. His movement, his ability to run at teams from deep, his interchanging of position with the other forward players is very important. At times, I have wondered why there has been such a focus on his position in the team and not others but that's the way it has been."
 
Almost to a man the media and the press are now supporting Sterling.
I say 'almost' to a man as Hoddle in this mornings Sunday Mail calls for
him to be dropped and replace by who?
Yes... Rashford.
Hoddle really is an odious shite of a human being. I fucking loath him.
 
Almost to a man the media and the press are now supporting Sterling.
I say 'almost' to a man as Hoddle in this mornings Sunday Mail calls for
him to be dropped and replace by who?
Yes... Rashford.
Hoddle really is an odious shite of a human being. I fucking loath him.
Hoddle is Rashford's biggest fan boy and will seldom give Raheem any praise. He will also never criticise any Spurs players.
 
You'd have thought so as that's where they get their "thinking".

There's a good piece on Sky's web page : http://www.skysports.com/football/n...217s-movement-is-crucial-to-this-england-team

Going off the comments however it could be a while before the muppets catch up.

I think this comment must have been from Hoddle!

"If Rashford had been starting in Sterling’s place through this World Cup he’d be in contention for the golden boot by now and that is the problem with Sterling - not that he’s not good or not trying he’s just not the best man for that job"
 
I think this comment must have been from Hoddle!

"If Rashford had been starting in Sterling’s place through this World Cup he’d be in contention for the golden boot by now and that is the problem with Sterling - not that he’s not good or not trying he’s just not the best man for that job"
Rashford hasn’t scored many for England either. At least sterling can say he’s not an actual striker
 
I think this comment must have been from Hoddle!

"If Rashford had been starting in Sterling’s place through this World Cup he’d be in contention for the golden boot by now and that is the problem with Sterling - not that he’s not good or not trying he’s just not the best man for that job"
Luckily for England, the only game they lost was the one Raheem didn't play in. Where would they be now if he'd have played and won?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.