Whilst that’s true for the vast majority of actual football fans the sky bt market of such east Lancs reds pandering, is aimed towards the those who don’t really follow football. Those with no allegiance who toss a coin to pick which cheek of the same arse to pretend to follow.
Media Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
Onholiday(somemightsay)
Well-Known Member
Much obliged...........
Ex-Sunday Express football writer to take employers to tribunal after sacking for 'gross misconduct' over column criticising Liverpool FC - Press Gazette
A long-serving Sunday Express football writer has lost his appeal against being dismissed for “gross misconduct” for writing a column criticising Liverpool FC fans, but plans to take the matter to an employment tribunal. Colin Mafham, who worked as a journalist for 50 years, including 15 years...pressgazette.co.uk
would that be the same enforcement of FFP that allowed them to "spend" £50m to dig a hole in Stanley park?
Yeah, there's that, plus the highlighted bit. I don't remember reading anywhere in the CAS judgement that "most" of the evidence was time barred.
laserblue
Well-Known Member
Maybe he could do an article on Liverpool failing FFP in 2013 and getting away with it only because they failed to qualify for Europe therefore falling out of UEFA's punishment remit. Or in 2015 when they were on the verge of failing FFP again until they magicked out of the air £35 million of years old bogus 'stadium development expenses' for the non-existent Stanley Park Project. All passed as kosher and promptly brushed under the carpet by Rick Parry, who was on UEFA's FFP investigatory panel, and his pals.
Their responses made me laugh:
"“We stand by our previous response that freedom of expression for journalists ‘is not a free pass to publish ill-informed, inaccurate, and misjudged comments’.”
and
"In its response to the case last year, Reach had said: “When journalists are given a platform for their opinions, it comes with the quid pro quo that what they write is to be founded on fact and reasoned argument".
So what part of his article was ill-informed and inaccurate and wasn't founded on fact and reasoned argument then? Or did Hillsborough and Heysel (and the rest) never happen? And as he said, they were the ones who went ahead and published it!
and this:
" Bringing up terrible events of 30 years ago probably was offensive much more"
Yet they choose to "remember" it every year.
You couldn't make it up.
yep, constant lies and misinformation
Truth-by-repetition: No matter how outrageous, repeated lies become the truth
It doesn't matter how ridiculous a lie is. As long as the lie is repeated often enough, some people will believe it.
bigthink.com
I think the actual term is "As long as the lie is repeated often enough, most people will believe it". But it will always be the same, whatever we win they will keep pointing towards the money, FFP or whatever while completely ignoring the fact that the likes of Liverpool have managed to earn and spend as much. Nobody ever mentions Chelsea either, who under Abramovich seemed to have a bottomless money pit.yep, constant lies and misinformation
Truth-by-repetition: No matter how outrageous, repeated lies become the truth
It doesn't matter how ridiculous a lie is. As long as the lie is repeated often enough, some people will believe it.
peps bald head
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2022
- Messages
- 86
Somehow 63% of the liverpool squad has asthma and are one PEDs/medication and somehow those fucks have the audacity to talk about cheating? We need to talk and mention that fact more often
- Status