Media thread 2022/23

[SebastianBlue]

How to turn a probable massive Liverpool negative, into a Liverpool positive, and a City negative, the Liverpool.com way, by their Fairy Tale writer, James Martin.

The Mirror has Liverpool.com beat…



Looking forward to next week’s article about how Phillips and Cucurella signing for us is a major coup for Klopp.

 

[JASR]

The Mirror has Liverpool.com beat…



Looking forward to next week’s article about how Phillips and Cucurella signing for us is a major coup for Klopp.

So, NOT taking players from same league rivals is a positive for Liverpool...

You know I could have sworn back in the day, the buying of Rio, Rooney, RVP etc from same league rivals was a positive for United...

Ah the fickleness of being a red shirt 'reporter'.

 

[Chris in London]

I submitted three ideas for articles to Liverpool.com.

(a) Why bears shitting in the woods is good news for Liverpool.
(b) Why the Pope's Catholicism is bad news for City.
(c) How the wetness of water favours Liverpool in the transfer market.

They accepted two, but I still want to know what they thought was wrong with bearshit.

 

[mat]

Have we sold Raheem?

Lost count of all the positive stories about him today.

 

[remember arthur mann]

Have we sold Raheem?

Lost count of all the positive stories about him today.

I want to know who this Jesus is, apparently the next Pele.

 

[Aphex]

The Mirror has Liverpool.com beat…



Looking forward to next week’s article about how Phillips and Cucurella signing for us is a major coup for Klopp.

It’s honestly one of my guilty pleasures. Those Echo headlines are just incredible. They are so beyond parody and truth, I think they need to invent a new terminology for them. It’s beyond my imagination. Perhaps someone like Dali? Beethoven maybe?

Edit:

Last paragraph in that article. I’ve read it about 10 times, but I still don’t know what the fuck this guy is on about

‘In the grand scheme of things, such nuances could be considered minor and unimportant. But the detail which goes into Liverpool’s transfer plans suggests such a trend is not a coincidence.’

 

[eyalluvitt]

Hilarious that when players are believed to be leaving City how they are lauded , Jesus is now a great signing , Sterling vastly underrated , Ake a £40m bargain but was overpriced when we bought him , the media agenda is astonishing but when we call the out we are being sensitive.
Don't think the media opinions of our club will ever change they have to placate their core following of Rags and Dippers , Foden having a barney with his missus and Jack having a few sherbets at a wedding our typical headlines in their search for negativity , desperate f*ckers.

40m for a backup/squad player Centre half is ruining football*











*just when City do it

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

So, NOT taking players from same league rivals is a positive for Liverpool...

You know I could have sworn back in the day, the buying of Rio, Rooney, RVP etc from same league rivals was a positive for United...

Ah the fickleness of being a red shirt 'reporter'.

Targetting the market audience perfectly - total imbeciles.

 

[Buckley Mug]

I submitted three ideas for articles to Liverpool.com.

(a) Why bears shitting in the woods is good news for Liverpool.
(b) Why the Pope's Catholicism is bad news for City.
(c) How the wetness of water favours Liverpool in the transfer market.

They accepted two, but I still want to know what they thought was wrong with bearshit.

Perhaps they would have accepted
Do sharks shit in the sea

 

[KS55]

Haaland’s 6 minute hat trick in his premier league debut at Wham shows the brilliance of Liverpool’s flop judgement.