Media thread 2022/23

[the blue panther]

Holt?
Posted this about him earlier in another thread:-
Well, having seen this bumbling troglodite numerous times, trying to express an opinion on the old Sunday Supplement, it's not surprising really that the City-hating member of the click-baiting, red-sympathising football press pack comes to that conclusion - and, who are we to argue?
I guess that near footballing perfection counts for nothing against the scum's extremely lucky win in 1999, equalising and getting their winner at the death of the match. A match in which they had 53% possession overall. And, not forgetting, the scum finished runners-up in the league with 77 points to Arsenal's 78, and hadn't qualified for the tournament as champions in their home competition the previous season.
Some pupils can't even recognise a masterclass when it's provided to them for free.
Stupid, or, clickbaiting? It cannot be serious journalism - which is stating the obvious really, as it's Oliver Holt.

 

[aguero93:20]

Southampton apparently.

Only when they're not playing the rags though.

 

[sincity]

A new low, even for him

I don't see why City can't sue them to oblivion for defamation, at the very least get them bankrupt so they won't have time to open their mouths again!

 

[Axel Freed]

Stockport fan, my arse!

Funny how CAS result has been ignored, how he ignores the input from the very top of rags and dippers and attempts to orchestrate this ?

Tousle haired scruffy rag apologist.

He’s an absolute joke but this is no joke to Oliver, he’s absolutely seething hence his full bingo card of anti City cliches ….. State this state that, FFP blah blah blah

Comparing our evisceration of the reigning European champions to the rags’ fortunate win at Juve thanks to a couple of breakaway goals just has the look of a deluded desperate rag battling against the mountains of evidence that show present day City to be levels above that Utd team

 

[woody1968]

You know when you go to the zoo and a chimp or a gorilla throw shit at you, it does so because that’s what they do - this is what we are up against with Gorilver Holt, Miguel Deluded et al. We should do no more than look and laugh and move on because they will always be “that side of the glass”.

 

[argyle]

Jesus. The Guardian are scraping the barrel with this.

"We invite your views so you can take time out of your day to tell us how much you don't care about little old City."

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

So tediously predictable.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I don't see why City can't sue them to oblivion for defamation, at the very least get them bankrupt so they won't have time to open their mouths again!

How does being bankrupt prevent someone from opening their mouth?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

To be fair to Holt, at least the **** waited until after the game before drawing unfavourable comparisons with united’s semi final in 1999.

In contrast, Herbert had the complete absence of professional self-respect to declare united’s treble win to be superior before we’d won a single trophy. Talk about desperate.

Some journalists are certainly better at hiding their bias than others.

 

[pauls]

To be fair to Holt, at least the **** waited until after the game before drawing unfavourable comparisons with united’s semi final in 1999.

In contrast, Herbert had the complete absence of professional self-respect to declare united’s treble win to be superior before we’d won a single trophy. Talk about desperate.

Some journalists are certainly better at hiding their bias than others.

Would love to re enact the final scene in the Great Escape, round every one of these twats up, drive them up to moors and shoot the fuckin lot of em.