crizack
Well-Known Member
lol BB.
Griffin does seem to be a bit of a swarmy bugger who will try his very best to dig his own grave then try and get out of it...but as much as he is a typical politician, i agree with his views on immigrants, i'm objecting to refugees using our country as a free dinner then thinking they have a right to state how we are governed, as if they have rights to dictate to a country that is giving them a better life...
i was always taught to not bite the hand that feeds, so instead of the radicals protesting on the uk streets demanding politicians and media correspondents to be murdered, the politicians that have allowed them into the country in the first place, shouldn't they just go back to their home countries where they cannot receive education, free healthcare, clean water and sufficient homing?
putting these people in prison is not going to solve the problem as there will just be more imigrant radicals coming in to begin the process over again..so now we understand there is a threat of terrorism in our country by even a few immigrants (doesn't take more than 5 or so to fly a plane or even 2 radicals to strap bombs to themselves does it?)...what do we do? the geneva convention protects people from being deported if they are at threat upon arrival of their former country which more or less, every asylum seeker states they will kill themselves if they have to go back or they say they will be killed...true, SOME may be true but if you had the threat of going to a third world country..wouldn't you say anything to make yourself stay put?)
so it's up to you lot. should we let them stay or just simply refuse entry to ALL refugees regardless of where they are from (which is what the BNP are saying to do).
I am looking forward to hearing some argumentative responses of which some will more than likely have no answers.
Griffin does seem to be a bit of a swarmy bugger who will try his very best to dig his own grave then try and get out of it...but as much as he is a typical politician, i agree with his views on immigrants, i'm objecting to refugees using our country as a free dinner then thinking they have a right to state how we are governed, as if they have rights to dictate to a country that is giving them a better life...
i was always taught to not bite the hand that feeds, so instead of the radicals protesting on the uk streets demanding politicians and media correspondents to be murdered, the politicians that have allowed them into the country in the first place, shouldn't they just go back to their home countries where they cannot receive education, free healthcare, clean water and sufficient homing?
putting these people in prison is not going to solve the problem as there will just be more imigrant radicals coming in to begin the process over again..so now we understand there is a threat of terrorism in our country by even a few immigrants (doesn't take more than 5 or so to fly a plane or even 2 radicals to strap bombs to themselves does it?)...what do we do? the geneva convention protects people from being deported if they are at threat upon arrival of their former country which more or less, every asylum seeker states they will kill themselves if they have to go back or they say they will be killed...true, SOME may be true but if you had the threat of going to a third world country..wouldn't you say anything to make yourself stay put?)
so it's up to you lot. should we let them stay or just simply refuse entry to ALL refugees regardless of where they are from (which is what the BNP are saying to do).
I am looking forward to hearing some argumentative responses of which some will more than likely have no answers.