hilts
Well-Known Member
For one stop saying our, it was other people are who are a long time dead.Yeah, I thought that might be the case, so wanted to make sure you knew both sides of my ancestry were bastards. ;-)
And I agree. My larger point was actually about putting history in to context of today and not ignoring how what has come before has shaped the present and will shape the future, like it has and is doing in Sudan today. We can’t fully understand the origins of these types of conflicts or the rampant exploitation of people around the globe that underpins Western wealth and our way of life (there is no such thing as “cheap” goods and services—someone, somewhere is paying for it) without working to understand what we did in the past to contribute to it.
Of course we have different ethical standards today than in centuries past, but that doesn’t excuse our actions then as ok—or mean they don’t impact the present—any more than a murderer excusing their crimes by saying they were “a different person” when they committed them years ago.
Mine was an argument for realism and accountability, rather than delusional (and dangerous) nostalgia or denial of history that has taken hold in many quarters today.
If anything, it was an argument against red Dipper philosophy, one of the main proponents of revisionist denialism! ;-)
May the ship remain now and forever as a reminder of where we have come from and where we are going.
The murderer analogy is laughable because they actually did it. We literally are different people who didn't. Bonkers.