GortonBlue62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 3,060
1. It's in the thread you're posting in.
2. It's common sense because City have planned for Pep for YEARS. He's part of a large scale transformation of the club and brand and he's the peg upon which it all hangs.
Oh, I was going off your post history and assuming that you would be quite sad to hear Pep Guardiola is staying even longer than his three year contract implied. My mistake.
That's not relevant because nobody gives two shits about your waist or hair. If you can't see why City and it's owners would care about Pep's pedigree and past accomplishments then I assume, naturally, you're being obtuse.
As do I.
It concerns me that we have fans who are only willing to give a manager half a season to turn around an aging squad that isn't even his.
So it didn't exist! Perfect! Emporers new clothes!
Nor wrong.
Are we?
Seems a number of people are taking optimism from the news our manager will extend his contract. Maybe you're just grumpy.
It was sang quite a lot before the game started and at the beginning of the first half.
But sure, keep on inventing masses of people who seem to agree with you about Pep and ignore the fact you're clearly in the minority here. It's hard to engage in any kind of constructive discussion with someone so unreasonable they are ready to condemn the manager as a fraud, ignoring his past accomplishments of course, based on half a season. You know why? Because it's fucking stupid.
My posting history is consistent and I stand by it.
My definition of a great manager is one who can take a group of players and produce a team that is greater than the sum of it's parts.
I prefer a manager who can deliver results to one with a philosophy and an idea that there is a right way to play football.
To repeat, for the umpteenth time, if Pep delivers, great (this is the ideal scenario), if he doesn't he has to go.
No one person is bigger than our club.