PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Prophet of Doom]

Not exactly legal language but spot on. As PR would say, they have over-reached. Either they have some damning new evidence that none of us know about, or they have fucked up / over-reached. I can't see much middle ground.

The fuck up is that the harsh point deductions open all the financial claims against Everton from other clubs that could put them out of business.

IF City and Chelsea are found guilty then we could face similar claims for literally hundreds of millions.

UEFA mainly slap fines on everybody for FFP breaches which relieves any potential claims from other clubs.

Masters will be responsible for destroying the Premier League - the destruction has started already

 

[g180aj]

Hacking is thieving .

Technically they didn’t hack us, we didn’t remove the logins of staff who had left, they continued to use there logins while working for Liverpool.

A little sloppy on our behalf.

 

[SWP's back]

The scouting databse stuff seems pretty desperate.

Unlike any of the 115 charges against City, it’s an actual break of U.K. law.

 

[malg]

This hacking story getting mentioned again is unfortunately a load of bollocks.

That ship sailed a long time ago - and won’t be getting looked into again.

I think it's all about mud slinging now. Can't see how it helps the PL. All this bollocks is only good for shite journalists and all those YouTube fannies.

 

[ayrshire_blue]

At a guess, I’d suggest it’s something to do with Mansour’s £750m investment into RedBird, who own 11% of Liverpool FC

Just a guess mind, but money does make the world go round

@Pablo ZZZ Peroni has already given information on the RedBird investment. I'm still not sure though if that answers @Invisible Man's Bandage question of is he then just putting 2 + 2 together and coming up with his own educated answer or is he privvy to further information. He mentions being a little "ITK" in one of his posts, but it'd be interesting to know to what extent, in what way and of what reliability he holds that status.

 

[lancs blue]

This hacking story getting mentioned again is unfortunately a load of bollocks.

That ship sailed a long time ago - and won’t be getting looked into again.

I think it's more about that and the Spurs case highlighting the inconsistency of the PL in investigating potential rule breaches.

 

[Chi-town blues]

Technically they didn’t hack us, we didn’t remove the logins of staff who had left, they continued to use there logins while working for Liverpool.

A little sloppy on our behalf.

So thieves are free and have right to go inside your house and steal your belongings coz they can ?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Technically they didn’t hack us, we didn’t remove the logins of staff who had left, they continued to use there logins while working for Liverpool.

A little sloppy on our behalf.

No. They used the login of an existing employee.

But it's irrelevant because (as I understand it) once that settlement is agreed and signed, there's no further civil or criminal recourse unless there's a specific provision in the settlement agreement.

 

[chaddblue]

Technically they didn’t hack us, we didn’t remove the logins of staff who had left, they continued to use there logins while working for Liverpool.

A little sloppy on our behalf.

So it's ok to burgle a house if you enter through an unlocked door?

 

[richards30]

No. They used the login of an existing employee.

But it's irrelevant because (as I understand it) once that settlement is agreed and signed, there's no further civil or criminal recourse unless there's a specific provision in the settlement agreement.

Hence we are just chucking it out in the public domain to shit stir and i`m all for it!