PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

bellsouth said:
He also said that FSR was brought in to curtail ‘investment’ - he didn’t say spending! The mask has slipped
Click to expand...

I thought he said it was introduced in 2013 to avoid another Portsmouth….. the lying cunts.

I wish I was on the panel as I’d have destroyed them with how it seems to be doing more harm than good.

Parry is destroying the EFL & I honestly believe the talk around parachute payments is to avoid clubs relegated coming back stronger. Essentially securing established prem clubs from ever getting relegated.
 
mancboy said:
the IC will have to debunk the evidence presented to them and publish why they have dismissed the evidence, as i keep on saying the two cases are entirely different regardless of what the press say, the everton and forest cases are right there in black and white with figures to prove it, if the pl had that on us then this would have been put to bed ages ago, what the pl are alleging is that we misrepresented our figures to allow us to spend more and it is that they have to prove and the ic has to say the pl proved that over our evidence so regardless of how much the press try and link the two cases they couldnt be more different.
Click to expand...

Cogent evidence but still remains on the balance of probabilities. I think what I mean is, that from the outset - the panel will feel under immense pressure to find those balance of probabilities and justify them by any means possible. They will be mindful of clearing our name and subsequently being accused of a large scale cover up by the media and then the millions of know nowts. Whether they're strong and objective enough to put up with that and purely judge the case on it's merits like they would with any other I'm honestly not so sure.
 
GaudinoMotors said:
Ivan Wankoff seems in the know.


@Ivan_Schwakoff
·
24 Dec 2022

BREAKING
1f6a8.svg
#LFC have agreed a club-record deal to sign Jude Bellingham from Borussia Dortmund.
Click to expand...
That didn't age well did it. These are the same idiots that think Mbappe is going to Liverpool.
 
ayrshire_blue said:
Cogent evidence but still remains on the balance of probabilities. I think what I mean is, that from the outset - the panel will feel under immense pressure to find those balance of probabilities and justify them by any means possible. They will be mindful of clearing our name and subsequently being accused of a large scale cover up by the media and then the millions of know nowts. Whether they're strong and objective enough to put up with that and purely judge the case on it's merits like they would with any other I'm honestly not so sure.
Click to expand...
the independent panel is anonymous and it is taking place behind closed doors so nobody knows who is on it do they?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.