Bluemoon230989
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 400
Think the question may have been tongue in cheek Stefan?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
I’m just keeping an open mind that’s all. He’s fully aware of the rumours of letters being sent out. Imagine he attracts thousand of City fans to his podcast only to show a fake letter calling us cheats. I’d probably laugh to be honest.From the little I saw, he didn't big it up. Just a comment in passing. If he had wanted to make a big splash he could have done a much better job, I think.
And don't forget, he, and and anyone else, can still talk about the allegations, what I imagine they can't say is that City are guilty, or are cheats, or only got off last time on a technicality. That sort of thing.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
It’s more likely he’s had a ‘continue and persist’ letter from the club, isn’t it?Have you had one?
To be fair, he could be on an almighty wind up. He knows this will attract thousands of more viewers.
He is 100% on the windup
Because utd fans would love that. He'd be a hero to them for trolling City.
He gets lots more clicks, this time from City fans too.
Everyone is talking about him and his show.
He is CLEARLY making a big point this showing he knows its worth.
The only question left (for me) is he a liar? I think yes having watched him before, he will say anything for clicks.
I expect more teasing or if this letter and more confusion than answers on Tuesday or whenever he is revealing this big exclusive.
City fans trusting this muppet is very dangerous imo but let's see what the prick has got.
A large percentage of United fans hate him. He isn’t a hero to United fans and never will be.
Don’t you think City fans will love it more?
The reaction from City fans since the cease and desist letters have gone out has been euphoric. It’s United (Liverpool) fans who are hating it more, as they now know City aren’t fucking about anymore.
Dangerous? He’s just a Forest/Rag Youtuber making money off gulible United fans. There’s absolutely nothing dangerous about him at all.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
He is already making a killing. City fans talking about him on here ain’t going to make much difference. I think we all would like to see this letter. Mainly to ascertain how much teeth it has to stop the accusations of financial doping.Because utd fans would love that. He'd be a hero to them for trolling City.
He gets lots more clicks, this time from City fans too.
Everyone is talking about him and his show.
He is CLEARLY making a big point this showing he knows its worth.
The only question left (for me) is he a liar? I think yes having watched him before, he will say anything for clicks.
I expect more teasing out of this letter and more confusion than answers on Tuesday or whenever he is revealing this big exclusive.
City fans trusting this muppet is very dangerous imo but let's see what the prick has got.
We all know he is playing to the gallery, we all know he is not a United fan. No one really cares. It’s an interesting development and one that looks good for city.
Who knows these daysThink the question may have been tongue in cheek Stefan?
To be fair, he could be on an almighty wind up. He knows this will attract thousands of more viewers.
We’ll find out on Tuesday.
He is already making a killing. City fans talking about him on here ain’t going to make much difference. I think we all would like to see this letter. Mainly to ascertain how much teeth it has to stop the accusations of financial doping.
We all know he is playing to the gallery, we all know he is not a United fan. No one really cares. It’s an interesting development and one that looks good for city.
Exactly.
No idea. I have heard all the rumours but my information is that nothing has changed I'm afraid. That is not to say that is correct information, just I have not been able to stand up any of the positive development rumours.Ok thanks for the reply. Why do you think, based on your professional opinion, city have acted in this way now? The abuse has been consistent for over 12 months.
What has changed? Or was this always the plan? What we have said in the past is that we will take no action against anyone who openly attacks the club over the financial irregularities. The change in tone is interesting.