Okay so on one side you have harris, de looney et al saying we are dodgy based on 6 emails and a case thats already been cleared once and on charges that were so badly thought out and rushed that they couldnt even get them right on the original charge sheet brought about by an organisation that hasnt got close to providing the level of proof provided and that has systematically damaged its product with ill thought out rules and on the other side you have royal family members, countries, one of the worlds largest investment vehicles, multiple global companies all being accused of lying, circumventing the rules and decieving 3 of the worlds pre eminent audit companies in order to benefit a football club that wouldnt even crack the top 50 on their list of investments, now take out the blue tinted glasses and city bias and ask yourself which one sounds more plausible