PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The PL leadership and their media pals have spent four years smearing and attacking us. I agree there can’t be any deal unless they are prepared to pay us for the reputational damage we have suffered.
When we are cleared I hope the club don't agree to any confidentiality clauses or conditionality.

Following years of comment,speculation,rumours,allegations, lies etc by the media and othe PL clubs, City must reserve the right of public response.

IMO, it should be in the form of a (short) factual 'cause,perpetrators & effect' statement which very clearly identifies the agitators and their objectives....ie Fear, Red Cartel, Destroy City.

Perhaps it should be written and distributed by Lord Pannick.
 
I am sure that the club has the ability to forensically examine online posts to determine author.
 
I read it through as well. How does Nick know what evidence the PL doesn't have? If Nick knows some damning evidence exists, why doesn't he tell the PL about it?

He seems a bit of a fantasist, and for a journalist, he isn't very good with his spelling.

The video shows the Magic Hat guy and Harris held online chats at 1am, 9pm, and 2:30am over various days. Harris is known to go online at these unearthly hours. If the Magic Hat guy is in America, the equivalent times in the UK are 6am, 2am and 7:30am. It is very strange that the two of them should be simultaneously online at 1am (Hat) and 6am (Harris), 9pm (Hat) and 2am (Harris), 2:30am (Hat) and 7:30am (Harris). (The second chat is not inconceivable). It is very unlikely that two people in the the same time zone are simultaneously online at 1am and 2:30am inside a period of just a few days. It is more credible that one person is the author of both conversations.
Oh I don't know if Harris is a bullshitter or not, I don't care really, but according to the chats he has relationships with the PL lawyers which seems more plausible than the mad hatter. But he's one of the more vocal critics of the club admitting that he's very worried about the outcome of what's happening right now.

I don't think either of them come out of the chat looking especially great, if it's all some grand plan then fuck knows what anyone is playing at.

And my initial thought when the mad hatter did his stuff was that he was merely going over stuff everyone already knew, putting a lot of spin and verbiage and stuff through the lens of a rival football fan, and dressing it up in expertise. I can actually see why Harris would be blunt with him in the way that he is: they're on the same side, but he's presenting old information as new, pretending Arsenal are the good guys in the whole thing (when I don't think Harris sees it that way either), and passing it off as expertise.
 
The dissenting member was UEFA's pick so no surprise there.
That’s my point. This time all three are PL picks, as far as I can see.

So my argument is: either we have a very strong case, trust the panel and therefore no need to settle.

OR

If we don’t trust them then it makes sense consider a settlement.

But we can’t say we don’t trust any of the PL appointed panel but won’t consider a settlement.

It’s one or the other.

Personally I trust that CAS wasn’t biased. In which case one judge thought that we did not have irrefutable evidence so there could be more of a risk than people think by going all the way.

If that makes sense!
 
Last edited:
I read it through as well. How does Nick know what evidence the PL doesn't have? If Nick knows some damning evidence exists, why doesn't he tell the PL about it?

He seems a bit of a fantasist, and for a journalist, he isn't very good with his spelling.

The video shows the Magic Hat guy and Harris held online chats at 1am, 9pm, and 2:30am over various days. Harris is known to go online at these unearthly hours. If the Magic Hat guy is in America, the equivalent times in the UK are 6am, 2am and 7:30am. It is very strange that the two of them should be simultaneously online at 1am (Hat) and 6am (Harris), 9pm (Hat) and 2am (Harris), 2:30am (Hat) and 7:30am (Harris). (The second chat is not inconceivable). It is very unlikely that two people in the the same time zone are simultaneously online at 1am and 2:30am inside a period of just a few days. It is more credible that one person is the author of both conversations.
Just an observation but if the Magic hat guy is in America wouldn't he be calling us 'Assholes' and not 'Arseholes' as in the previous tweet?
 
Oh I don't know if Harris is a bullshitter or not, I don't care really, but according to the chats he has relationships with the PL lawyers which seems more plausible than the mad hatter. But he's one of the more vocal critics of the club admitting that he's very worried about the outcome of what's happening right now.

I don't think either of them come out of the chat looking especially great, if it's all some grand plan then fuck knows what anyone is playing at.

And my initial thought when the mad hatter did his stuff was that he was merely going over stuff everyone already knew, putting a lot of spin and verbiage and stuff through the lens of a rival football fan, and dressing it up in expertise. I can actually see why Harris would be blunt with him in the way that he is: they're on the same side, but he's presenting old information as new, pretending Arsenal are the good guys in the whole thing (when I don't think Harris sees it that way either), and passing it off as expertise.
Harris sees the City FFP saga as a meal ticket. He doesn’t want anyone else taking the bread out of his mouth. He’s a starving freelance in a shrinking market.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.