asahartford1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 9,732
That is self-evident but not the issue being debated. I would add that if any of the substantive charges are upheld it would be catastrophic for our club.
I wasn't in a debate.
That is self-evident but not the issue being debated. I would add that if any of the substantive charges are upheld it would be catastrophic for our club.
not from this year's Khaldoon interview anyway - 4'40 inno, he is taking the piss
just a random observation unconnected to the thread discussion then?I wasn't in a debate.
You may be right. However I doubt Pep goes on holiday during an international break as a matter of course as opposed to taking a short break. As pointed out elsewhere the club will have planned for all outcomes including adverse findings. In my view some level of criticism is veryIts a signal that he is going on holiday and thats it, absolutely nothing to do with anything else its his last chance to have a break before the next internal break in March 2026 Its something he does when there is an international break
I doubt he will struggle with any media frenzy following the publication of the award, in fact when we are found to be "innocent" he will probably relish it
No - this is a cup final. It may go to extra time but hopefully not penalties!Any chance the final result of this conflict could be a bore draw?
just a random observation unconnected to the thread discussion then?
He pretty much does "go away" during the breaks defining it as a holiday or a short break is semantics, and if its his words then he's speaking in his second language so might be less preciseI doubt Pep goes on holiday during an international break as a matter of course as opposed to taking a short break.
I think that's the most likely outcome.Any chance the final result of this conflict could be a bore draw?
Nonsense, two different things. The club and every single supporter will welcome a successful outcome to all this and it will happen soon btw.
I'm not an "ITK" (yes, honestly!) but I wouldn't be all that surprised if they're trying to come to some "face saving" compromise behind the scenes before any public announcement(s).Any chance the final result of this conflict could be a bore draw?
I'm not an "ITK" (yes, honestly!) but I wouldn't be all that surprised if they're trying to come to some "face saving" compromise behind the scenes before any public announcement(s).
Thanks for your advocacy mate.This thread has some of the shittest devil's advocating attempts I have ever seen. Pages and pages of it.
Ffs slbsn couldn't be clearer in what he is saying. Whether he is right or wrong, agree or disagree and time will tell. This constant nitpicking in an attempt to catch something out now really is a total waste of time.
Well, to be fair, experts do tend to know more than people who are less informed on a subject. It's why they're experts - and generally (not absolutely always) why they're worth listening to.
You consider them to be experts? What in?Have you ever listened to Jamie O’Hara, Charlie Austin or Clinton Morrison and thought they were worth listening to?
Bless.Interesting, may I ask if that is a quote from this year? If so, I'm worried.
Do I fuck that’s my point.You consider them to be experts? What in?