PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Bald fraud]

Top story on the daily Mail now. Negative one so it will stay there for days. If it was positive it’d be down in the hour

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Top story on the daily Mail now. Negative one so it will stay there for days. If it was positive it’d be down in the hour

No surprises there then. Night follows day etc

Best advice is don't read the shite the mail ever puts out - you'll feel better in the end.

 

[Sheikh rattle and roll]

He used the office and his position as Mayor Greater Manchester to lobby the PL is support of a company not in Greater Manchester I have requested from the combined authority and explanation of the abuse of the office They have 3 more days in which to reply

Brilliant please keep us all updated
- up the blues

 

[HelloCity]

Not a lawyer but believe illegally obtained material is unusable in a court, but City have not been to court. The real question is, is the material strong enough evidence to start the UEFA investigation, or the PL investigation. Personally i always thought it was highly suggestive but not proof. As for Pinto, if he were selling, do you not think he would have sold something more valuable, the first time?
For me this is the press, trying to make up for the massive own goal, when they published `City to sue` as the 115 panel will have to reassess the independence of the investigation. The Government too will be very interested.

It was used at CAS.

 

[Blueboy73]

Top story on the daily Mail now. Negative one so it will stay there for days. If it was positive it’d be down in the hour

A positive story wouldn't have been published at all.

 

[WRicko]

Not read the article about the latest situation it’s just annoying now. However it makes no sense he leaked info last time don’t know if he got paid but seems not and presumably he cannot benefit from illegal acts. So it would seem if he had anything he would have released it first or before what he has already released or before now. What does he hope that we pay him off ? Yeh right

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

Not read the article about the latest situation it’s just annoying now. However it makes no sense he leaked info last time don’t know if he got paid but seems not and presumably he cannot benefit from illegal acts. So it would seem if he had anything he would have released it first or before what he has already released or before now. What does he hope that we pay him off ? Yeh right

Why would he hold back info from the initial stuff sent to Der Spiegal 6 years ago? He’s a two bit criminal probably thinks he can black mail people with threats, anyway if the Premier League are fully disclosing emails for the 115 hearing would City not be too? If it’s on an email server wouldn’t the people involved in this hearing be able to see it anyways rather than hacked information?

 

[leithblue]

“Pinto, who has been in a witness protection programme since 2020”


“Pinto told the OffShore-Alert Marbella Conference”

So, which is it?

 

[jrb]

FFS , what now?!

 

[Keep the Faith]

Maybe, just maybe it's bullshit that has been released at this time with the blessings of the PL who want to do a climb down deal with City.

The report says "investigators" not "Arbitrators" approached his Legal Team, so would appear nothing related to the on going case