PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

So for £67.5 million per anum (1.5% of mean annual revenue), do Etihad Airways sponsors of the football World Champions receive value for money ?
The Premier League wants to remain the best league in the world but at the same time it wants to restrain its members' revenue avenues? Make it make sense.

If the Premier League wants english clubs to ever have a strangehold on European trophies it needs to do away with PSR and let clubs put in how much money they want to put in.
 
So for £67.5 million per anum (1.5% of mean annual revenue), do Etihad Airways sponsors of the football World Champions receive value for money ?

Off the top of my head, they receive the following services:-

1 A large part of Manchester M11 has been named the Etihad campus for over a decade now.

2 The Etihad Airways stadium sign is seen by millions of passengers flying into Manchester Airport on the east Manc inbound route.

3 The millions of people who have seen Etihad Airways ads during visits to the stadium for games/concerts/conferences etc.

4 The hundreds of millions of people who have seen Etihad Airways on MCFC kits (men and women) during televised games

5 The millions of MCFC/Etihad references seen daily on digital platforms all over the globe, news, social media etc

6 The millions of passengers who have flown on Etihad Airways aircraft painted in the beautiful sky blue MCFC livery.

7 The millions of replica kits worn around the world by fans with the ’can’t miss’ Etihad Airways brand on display

8 The Manchester Metro Etihad station, used/seen by hundreds of thousands of rag commuters.

How does that lot compare to the dipps for receiving £50 per anum for Standard Chartered on their kits?, is it Fair Market Value ?

You’d have to ask ISIS…….
 
Did you ask Raggie why Chevrolet sacked the person who negotiated their sponsorship deal with his shit club because it was over inflated or why the Team Viewer sponsorship deal was approved even though the financial information available showed and was subsequently proved that they couldn't afford to honour it.
If he wants to go back further, ask him why the questions that Coolmore asked about Fergusons dodgy financial deals were never answered or why they were allowed to generate millions of pounds by floating on the stock market when FA rules permitted this at the time.
And that some of city's charges relate to Mancini receiving money for a consultancy role in the UAE when managing City
Ferguson received a large stake in a racehorse as a bonus, which everyone knows about, and this was never questioned
 
Did you ask Raggie why Chevrolet sacked the person who negotiated their sponsorship deal with his shit club because it was over inflated or why the Team Viewer sponsorship deal was approved even though the financial information available showed and was subsequently proved that they couldn't afford to honour it.
If he wants to go back further, ask him why the questions that Coolmore asked about Fergusons dodgy financial deals were never answered or why they were allowed to generate millions of pounds by floating on the stock market when FA rules permitted this at the time.

Could also ask him if there was a contract for off the book payments to the Piss Can from Coolmore which ended with a £3m tax free out of court settlement. What services did GPC provide for that & as it was only 2004 just 4 years prior to Mancini will it be investigated?
 
None of us know for sure, but yes I don't think they have anything beyond the emails. I think I'm probably with CAS that if we played nicer earlier on then we might have avoided this altogether, but also understand the club's position that they don't trust them as far as they can throw them.
When it comes to the EPL,It depends what they've asked for & whether it's in their remit. I would presume Etihad accounts don't come under their remit
 
And that some of city's charges relate to Mancini receiving money for a consultancy role in the UAE when managing City
Ferguson received a large stake in a racehorse as a bonus, which everyone knows about, and this was never questioned

Oops beat me to it.
 
The Premier League wants to remain the best league in the world but at the same time it wants to restrain its members' revenue avenues? Make it make sense.

If the Premier League wants english clubs to ever have a strangehold on European trophies it needs to do away with PSR and let clubs put in how much money they want to put in.
When you say English clubs do you mean only red cartel clubs
 
No matter how much a certain club from Stretford spend, they still manage to finish rock bottom in a group stage consisting of Galatasary and Copenhagen.

Give those same financial resources to a club like Leicester or West Ham and they get to the Semi Finals.
And that is the difference, they can have all the resources, but they have idiots spending it
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.