PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[KS55]

That is pretty much my view in a nutshell.

The one point I don’t understand and maybe one of our legal experts can explain.
To accuse us of effectively cooking the books. They would need access to said books and the detail of the transactions.
I am pretty sure they haven’t.
So how can the PL get away with charging city on that with no evidence.
They could throw the same allegation out to any club in the league.
They should not be allowed to do so without substantial evidence

It is access to the documents in each accounts “bin” that they hoped would provide evidence. They asked for thousands of these docs.

 

[KS55]

Times vs The Sun
Bigger words and less tits and bingo.

Funnily enough, the Times was the first British newspaper to show a models nipples. They appeared in an ad featuring Vivienne Neves.

 

[KS55]

Doesn't Winter write for the times, so I'm not so sure about the tits

I think Winter has been binned by the Times. Can anyone confirm?

 

[69FACUPfinal]

I think Winter has been binned by the Times. Can anyone confirm?

He has. Circa 5-6 months ago.

 

[Goatmeal]

It is access to the documents in each accounts “bin” that they hoped would provide evidence. They asked for thousands of these docs.

My point is more about changing us without the evidence. Charging us by assumption

 

[KS55]

My point is more about changing us without the evidence. Charging us by assumption

Yup. I think that was in response to the announcement of an independent regulator. Then they keep looking. What do you do if you find nothing but the redshirts are bellowing in your ears every day?

 

[Brightwell Bros.]

My point is more about changing us without the evidence. Charging us by assumption

The emails don't look good in isolation, so it's not without evidence. But as CAS showed emails can look bad and then have perfectly fine reasons for them and/or doesn't mean it has happened.

 

[Goatmeal]

The emails don't look good in isolation, so it's not without evidence. But as CAS showed emails can look bad and then have perfectly fine reasons for them and/or doesn't mean it has happened.

So basically the PL are barking up the same wrong tree as UEFA
That’s how I have seen it all along. It just puzzles me that the PL are stupid enough to do the same

 

[MMA]

So has United Arsenal , Tottenham and Liverpools books been scrutinized like ours for the past 10 years..?

Are they absolutely whiter then white when it comes to how they conduct business?
Who review's their accounts??
What have we done so wrong that they all do everything so right every season?

 

[LeonardoDaVnci]

So for £67.5 million per anum (1.5% of mean annual revenue), do Etihad Airways sponsors of the football World Champions receive value for money ?

Off the top of my head, they receive the following services:-

1 A large part of Manchester M11 has been named the Etihad campus for over a decade now.

2 The Etihad Airways stadium sign is seen by millions of passengers flying into Manchester Airport on the east Manc inbound route.

3 The millions of people who have seen Etihad Airways ads during visits to the stadium for games/concerts/conferences etc.

4 The hundreds of millions of people who have seen Etihad Airways on MCFC kits (men and women) during televised games

5 The millions of MCFC/Etihad references seen daily on digital platforms all over the globe, news, social media etc

6 The millions of passengers who have flown on Etihad Airways aircraft painted in the beautiful sky blue MCFC livery.

7 The millions of replica kits worn around the world by fans with the ’can’t miss’ Etihad Airways brand on display

8 The Manchester Metro Etihad station, used/seen by hundreds of thousands of rag commuters.

How does that lot compare to the dipps for receiving £50 per anum for Standard Chartered on their kits?, is it Fair Market Value ?