Anyone else think Abu Dhabi intelligence service may have something to do with this. I always thought that with the Blatter /Platini shenanigans
Thought that also - I would love it to be true!Anyone else think Abu Dhabi intelligence service may have something to do with this. I always thought that with the Blatter /Platini shenanigans
They already did that with the Liverpool database hacking incident, claiming (a couple of years ago) that "it was too long ago" for them to take action against what was clearly a criminal offence.The daft thing that the pl are dong here is creating legal precedent and effectively shooting themselves in the foot for any current or future cases
I wonder if our board would have done things differently, re the database case, if knowing then what they know now?They already did that with the Liverpool database hacking incident, claiming (a couple of years ago) that "it was too long ago" for them to take action against what was clearly a criminal offence.
Yet they're taking action against us going back to 2009, on the possibility there might have been a potential criminal offence, because there's no implied or explicit statute of limitations where criminal activity is involved or suspected.
we wouldn't of taken a pinch all them years agoI wonder if our board would have done things differently, re the database case, knowing then what they know now?
From here on in our board need to take no prisoners in future dealings with other clubs.
They already did that with the Liverpool database hacking incident, claiming (a couple of years ago) that "it was too long ago" for them to take action against what was clearly a criminal offence.
Yet they're taking action against us going back to 2009, on the possibility there might have been a potential criminal offence, because there's no implied or explicit statute of limitations where criminal activity is involved or suspected.
so it does make you wonder why they are taking it as far as they have when immediately that question is going to be asked as to why the difference in stance and i cant wait to see how theyre going to explain that one away without admitting that they consistently favour man utd and liverpool at every term.They already did that with the Liverpool database hacking incident, claiming (a couple of years ago) that "it was too long ago" for them to take action against what was clearly a criminal offence.
Yet they're taking action against us going back to 2009, on the possibility there might have been a potential criminal offence, because there's no implied or explicit statute of limitations where criminal activity is involved or suspected.
It’s not a football or a club driven issue to be fair, it’s not going to have sports journalists being the main reporters on it.
Dodgy owner doing illegal insider trading* some 10 years ago whilst no doubt leading the crusade to discredit, disable and damage our club to the maximum.
If I was a journalist I'd be all over this, potentially a huge story..
Not a chance of this happening though..
Kaldoon's "we hear, see and know everything in the game" looks like it's finally coming to fruition ..
I sincerely hope we've had a discreet input in this, you know, just to get the ball rolling..
Fkin Levy telling one and all how he wouldn't pick up the phone to us when we were looking at Kane..
Smarmy looking ****..!
Please let this knob have his fingers in the same pie too..
I'd laugh my b*locks off ..
* allegedly