Written by a rag. Guess whose treble he mentions and whose he doesn’t.
Yeah it's about trophies won and still find it baffling they include the charity shield in it!
Written by a rag. Guess whose treble he mentions and whose he doesn’t.
I have definitely seen those emails before - I would be surprised if CAS did not.'Magic hat' has put another thread on twitter this morning relating to our case including some hacked emails that weren't used at CAS.
Some of them do look like they could be an issue
noAren't they in the top ten of everything in football history in the uk?
Would it be fair to say "Magic Hat" supports a team that plays in red and is using City for clicks/engagement, and to take the focus away from the failures of their own team this season?'Magic hat' has put another thread on twitter this morning relating to our case including some hacked emails that weren't used at CAS.
Some of them do look like they could be an issue
But he's magic.That's because he isn't very bright
Emails are not evidence of any substantive events referred to. Thus, if I email you telling you to bring your affair with Kate Middleton to an end, it is not evidence of an affair unless corroborated by other evidence. Emails are evidence of a conversation and therefore may be evidence of conspiracy, but even then it would be hard to prove without any substantive act being evidenced elsewhere. CAS afforded the emails little probative value.I have definitely seen those emails before - I would be surprised if CAS did not.
Time will tell if they mean anything more than nothing.
First team to win the double in the 20th century and possibly first English team to win a European trophy.What have Spurs done to be called "big"? No league title for more than 60 years doesn't make them big. All they have is a shiny new stadium with a large catchment area plus...importantly...London prices. Big profits assured doesn't make them big in status.
I get your point. But the IC will definitely ask our lawyers the very obvious question "Why these damaging emails would even exist if Man City has done nothing wrong or has nothing to hide?".Emails are not evidence of any substantive events referred to. Thus, if I email you telling you to bring your affair with Kate Middleton to an end, it is not evidence of an affair unless corroborated by other evidence. Emails are evidence of a conversation and therefore may be evidence of conspiracy, but even then it would be hard to prove without any substantive act being evidenced elsewhere. CAS afforded the emails little probative value.