Those of a certain age have only known the cartel teams in red dominate, apart from the Chelski abberation. They dominate the British media having built their careers on it. Fergusons class of 1992 happened over 30 years ago, Liverpools golden age even longer ago whilst Wenger hung on to their shirt tails without dominating.I think that's why City don't pay much attention to the British press/media. City are on the world stage not just little old England and it's bitter press/media
Kids in the UK now only remember City success and the media click chasers will soon go the way of Hanson and Lawro as pundits (How many remember them?)
Outside the UK, interest in the Premier League is relativelely recent so their history club narrative is as relevant as the success of the likes of Aston Villa, Sunderland, Newcastle and other clubs who enjoyed their peak success over 100 years ago.
The facts and figures for MCFC speak for themselves. City is on the world stage and the British press/media anti bias is little more than paraochial diversion as part of the campaign against City promoted by American owned teams in red who believe our owners should know their place and defer to them.
After all UAE was effectively a UK colony until fairly recently yet the FA predates the likes of Germany as a nation for example and when exactly was the Civil War in the USA? Nothing positive will come out of trying to reason with these people so best to ignore.