PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Giovinco said:
Listening to Stefan on talk sport, the premier league must be up to their eye balls in litigation.

Chelsea, Leicester, city all currently have litigation with the premier league, how are the PL managing to deal with all this?
Click to expand...

The money fighting the legal stuff will be making the pot they devide up between their stakeholders (20 Premier League clubs) and also what they can contribute to the lower levels of the football pyramid smaller and smaller. All because the rags and dippers can’t hack they aren’t top dogs anymore.
 
give it to gordon said:
I think that's why City don't pay much attention to the British press/media. City are on the world stage not just little old England and it's bitter press/media
Click to expand...
Those of a certain age have only known the cartel teams in red dominate, apart from the Chelski abberation. They dominate the British media having built their careers on it. Fergusons class of 1992 happened over 30 years ago, Liverpools golden age even longer ago whilst Wenger hung on to their shirt tails without dominating.

Kids in the UK now only remember City success and the media click chasers will soon go the way of Hanson and Lawro as pundits (How many remember them?)

Outside the UK, interest in the Premier League is relativelely recent so their history club narrative is as relevant as the success of the likes of Aston Villa, Sunderland, Newcastle and other clubs who enjoyed their peak success over 100 years ago.

The facts and figures for MCFC speak for themselves. City is on the world stage and the British press/media anti bias is little more than paraochial diversion as part of the campaign against City promoted by American owned teams in red who believe our owners should know their place and defer to them.

After all UAE was effectively a UK colony until fairly recently yet the FA predates the likes of Germany as a nation for example and when exactly was the Civil War in the USA? Nothing positive will come out of trying to reason with these people so best to ignore.
 
Axel Freed said:
“What are we fixing, what was broken” pleads Simon querying the logic behind the introduction of PSR.

This from the **** who for years has been saying likkle City are ruining the PL by winning it every year.
Click to expand...
What was "broken" was that Man United and Arsenal weren't guaranteed to fucking win everything. At last the penny is starting to drop.
 
Giovinco said:
Listening to Stefan on talk sport, the premier league must be up to their eye balls in litigation.

Chelsea, Leicester, city all currently have litigation with the premier league, how are the PL managing to deal with all this?
Click to expand...
A complete fiasco. None of these clubs have broken any law. They have not gone bust or failed to pay their debts. They have just shown ambition and invested in their business. Leicester have done great things in their local community. Why are they being persecuted along with City?
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
A complete fiasco. None of these clubs have broken any law. They have not gone bust or failed to pay their debts. They have just shown ambition and invested in their business. Leicester have done great things in their local community. Why are they being persecuted along with City?
Click to expand...
Because they had the temerity to win the league ahead of cartel simp club Spurs.
 
Brendan110_0 said:
Because they had the temerity to win the league ahead of cartel simp club Spurs.
Click to expand...
Leicester are accused of getting a sporting advantage for the season they were relegated. Some sort of collective madness has overtaken the PL leadership. Who is paying for all these legal battles. And still the PSR rules take no account of debt.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
A complete fiasco. None of these clubs have broken any law. They have not gone bust or failed to pay their debts. They have just shown ambition and invested in their business. Leicester have done great things in their local community. Why are they being persecuted along with City?
Click to expand...

Hopefully more and more people will realise before the pl collapses.
Ffp and psr have nothing to do with sustainability it's all about keeping the cartel at the top.
 
Brendan110_0 said:
Because they had the temerity to win the league ahead of cartel simp club Spurs.
Click to expand...
As long as investment is forbidden there's a good chance that the three teams coming up will go straight back down, so your Palaces,Brentford,Brighton,Fulham etc will vote with the cartel to preserve their 150m payouts every season from Dick Masters. This was one of City's beefs at the APT hearing I would suggest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.