PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I prefer my explanation that, after the PL continued with their investigation following the CAS decision, the club have cleverly manipulated the PL into going through this whole process to get it finalised once and for all.

I have a few reasons for thinking that but I won't repeat them here as I don't think anyone else agrees with me :)

But there are two questions to which I am hoping we will find the answer once the dust has settled on the judgment:

Why did the PL continue with the investigation once CAS had concluded. The easy answer is rival pressure, but really?

Why did the PL continue with the disciplinary process in February 2023? That is when I don't really think they had a choice. And that is where my original point comes in. I think they didn't have a choice because the club put them in that position.

So, I am not worrying.

If I am right, the club are extraordinarily confident even in some of the less serious areas where I don't think we have enough information to come to a conclusion ourselves, such as Fordham and Toure. That's good enough for me.

And if I am wrong well, what the fuck, it won't be the first time :D

Hope that helps.

Cheers
 
Just had a very nice Centre cut applewood smoked bacon and opulent rich yolk Clarence Court egg on seeded whole meal sandwich so will be skipping lunch today, but thanks for the heads up on the deployment of that sinfully wank, small-time expression.
 
Thanks for the information.

Could you say what "won the case" meant, in your opinion? That the PL couldn't prove the most serious allegations? Or that they couldn't prove any?

In a complicated case like this, or the APT case, I always think "won" or "lost" aren't particularly helpful for understanding what's going on ....
You can guarantee mate that if city are found to have breached any of the rules it’ll be reported as we “lost” and are “guilty”.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top