gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Roan is the most malign of the lot, but he’s always stayed (legally) the right side of the line.Dan Roan hopefully. He’s orchestrated an awful lot of shit and set the narrative of inevitable guilt.
Roan is the most malign of the lot, but he’s always stayed (legally) the right side of the line.Dan Roan hopefully. He’s orchestrated an awful lot of shit and set the narrative of inevitable guilt.
Roan is the most malign of the lot, but he’s always stayed (legally) the right side of the line.
He needs another stadium ban. One of the worst of the lot. If not the worst.That’s true but, he’s dragged us through the mud more than anyone. He even did his reports about Everton and Forest and their points deductions standing outside the Etihad. There was absolutely no need for that and he was clearly put up to that by his mates at the Red Cartel.
Don’t disagree with any of that but the original question was framed around ‘going after’ people and there are no discernible grounds to do that in terms of Roan. I’d love the **** to be banned, just for shits and giggles but there’s no chance of that happening imo.That’s true but, he’s dragged us through the mud more than anyone. He even did his reports about Everton and Forest and their points deductions standing outside the Etihad. There was absolutely no need for that and he was clearly put up to that by his mates at the Red Cartel.
Not sure "going after" the free press is something Id like to see, especially considering who our owners are not sure if it's a good look. As long as the verdict is transparent and totally exonerates the owners of any wrong doing, I will settle for that, the worst thing you can do to a journalist is hurt their credibility. A lot of people could be left with egg on their faces.Seriously, if City are Successful does anyone have a Number 1 Journo Target they think the Club will go for?
GoldbridgeSeriously, if City are Successful does anyone have a Number 1 Journo Target they think the Club will go for?
He said journo not social media dick headsGoldbridge
You say that but that social media dickhead has 2 million subscribers.his reach far outweighs the daily papers nowadays.He said journo not social media dick heads
Dan Roan who seems to think that 115 Charges is part of our name. Every fucking report he does, Manchester City...115 charges! ****Seriously, if City are Successful does anyone have a Number 1 Journo Target they think the Club will go for?
Our success both on and off the field is the way we proceed. It hurts them far more than any other form of "punishment"Seriously, if City are Successful does anyone have a Number 1 Journo Target they think the Club will go for?
You can fool a lot of stupid people most of the time. Is that the saying.You say that but that social media dickhead has 2 million subscribers.his reach far outweighs the daily papers nowadays.
He's just won rights to show German top flight football as well.
He's fooled the rags into thinking he's a fan I'll give him that.You can fool a lot of stupid people most of the time. Is that the saying.
Matthew SyedSeriously, if City are Successful does anyone have a Number 1 Journo Target they think the Club will go for?
Cheating ping pong twat.Matthew Syed
It's a long list.Seriously, if City are Successful does anyone have a Number 1 Journo Target they think the Club will go for?
Seriously, if City are Successful does anyone have a Number 1 Journo Target they think the Club will go for?
Couldn’t he be banned for entering the stadium the other week with a dodgy ticket?Don’t disagree with any of that but the original question was framed around ‘going after’ people and there are no discernible grounds to do that in terms of Roan. I’d love the **** to be banned, just for shits and giggles but there’s no chance of that happening imo.