chesterguy said:
I do wonder how many of those who are shouting for youth players to play against Southampton have actually seen the players play in the flesh. I have seen a few of the games live and especially in the Porto game it was clear that the boys are not yet ready to step up and play in a Premier league game
Maybe half a dozen live and another half dozen on TV/streams. Personally I think we have quite a few that are ready to take that next step up. We've got an amazing squad of players, adding a couple of youth doesn't make it a bad one.
You really think based on what you have seen that a few are ready to play for a team competing for the league...really!!!!! Did you not watch the Porto game we were completely physically dominated
I wonder how many are wanting the young players to play so that they can counter the arguments with other supporters about not playing youth rather than the considering the development of the players themselves
Don't give a toss what other supporters say. When (if) we start playing kids they'll find something else to slag us off about.
Fair enough I wonder if everyone feels like that
It is clear from comments made by PV that he realises there is a huge gulf between EDS football and the Premier and even MP alluded do it in his conference saying that is is easier for clubs like Southampton to take a chance on young players as they are not expected to be challenging for titles cups and CL
This is why today is an ideal time. No pressure to challenge for titles, cups or CL.
Why is this an ideal time as I say what would we learn from a one off game. City are trying to develop a culture of continued success. Young players develop in the youth team then go on loan ie Guidetti, Denayer Rekik Lopes if they are good enough they will be kept if not they have been in the shop window. Its only by playing regularly in a professional league can we get to know how good these players are likely to be
If we were to play a team full of young players tomorrow what we are likely to learn really. Nothing. It would probably show what we already know that these players aren't ready for this level of football but how can we judge in a meaningless one off game at the end of the season. There may be 1 or 2 individuals who could make the step up but City are trying to create a system for many to develop
I think that's a mistake we've made in the past, playing a B team in cups rather than play the top players with one or two kids in.
When have City played a B side in a cup game?
I would much rather that these players start playing against men teams in pre-season and those who are ready for 1st team football get loaned out and the rest continue to develop under PV. When we are winning the EDS league with players who look like they physically cope with the demands of first team football then is the time for the clamour for yourh to be given a chance to be heard....that time is not now
Winning the U21 league isn't a measure of development for our club. We don't play senior players, and often play underage/U18 players. Playing in pre season is good for the kids, but doesn't come close to the experience they would gain from playing an actual league match. The intensity of a pre-season game would be less than they get at underage level.