Ok and thanks. Sorry for the probably unnecessary comment about the one-man crusade in the last bias thread - frustrating as it was commenting on it is not really helpful.
No worries mate. I think in the old thread you had people on both sides who just had a default stance, regardless of which example of supposed bias was raised.
Hopefully discussing individual incidents on their merits might be more interesting than the same posters saying "There is an agenda", "No there isn't" etc ad nauseum.