vintiz
Well-Known Member
Re: Samir Nasri
I for one can't wait to see both of them play well together. I love samis movements and sliva's magic !<br /><br />-- Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:22 pm --<br /><br />ws01 said:I'll be very interested to see how he responds when Merl comes back. When he plays alongside him we know he loafs around and becomes passive.
If Pellegrini can get the two of them working efficiently in tandem we'll be unstoppable.
Well tbf to mancini he wanted city to use the 3-5-2 formation where the wing backs would provide width. Bearing in mind that city was getting tooo narrow and that teams where doing a chelsea for us. But why the 3-5-3 formation didn't work is what idkZlatan said:vintiz said:Errrm he had adam johnson..and what did he do to him ? He sold him and got us scott sinclair.Zlatan said:I agree to all of you. But it is not so simple. I think IF he was played last year like this year in HIS REAL position at least 5 games in the row he would be as good as this year. Mancini played him as a winger. He is no winger he is a central midfielder - playmaker. An that makes you wonder why did Mancini by one extra great playmaker Nasri which he played on the wings ( He allready had one great playmaker SIlva ). Would it be more logical to by one great real winger ( becasue he didint have none ) and play him on his position as a winger ????
Which only shows you that Mancini apparently didin want to use wingers, which is rarity in footbal world. I also think that he bought Johnson as an alternative. He knew from the begining that he will not be in the first 11. With the money he had , he could buy real winger ( top 10 in world ). He just diidnt want to play with the wingers ???? ( and played with 4 cental midfielders instead ). He could off buy for example Bale if he wanted. He just needed to say yes.