Player thread: Samir Nasri (2014/15)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Samir Nasri

uwe rosler 28 said:
KippaxCitizen said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Pellegrini hasn't played 433 for one minute of one game since he arrived, so he isn't going to start in the hardest game of the season. I've a feeling he will go with the 4222 again, in the absence of Nasri and Milner, with Navas wide right. Navas does actually tackle back very well, so this might not be a bad idea. As Barca come at us he might get some space to break, too.
We played 4-3-3 for the last (dunno exactly) 15mins or so against Palace.

played 4-3-3 at chelsea and bayern.

No we didn't. We played 4231 in both.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

blueparrot said:
The picture in the MEN says he was leaving after a scan, surely if it was that bad he would have been whisked of to a specialist or a surgeon, not walking out crutches or no crutches.

He'll have to wait a couple of weeks for his GP to receive the scan, then go on the waiting list once he finally gets a GP appointment a week or so later.

God only knows how long he'll be out.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Bobby Taylor's Pub Team said:
blueparrot said:
The picture in the MEN says he was leaving after a scan, surely if it was that bad he would have been whisked of to a specialist or a surgeon, not walking out crutches or no crutches.

He'll have to wait a couple of weeks for his GP to receive the scan, then go on the waiting list once he finally gets a GP appointment a week or so later.

God only knows how long he'll be out.

That's if they don't lose the scan or he doesn't ring the GP to check that it is back because the GP will never ring him!!
 
Re: Samir Nasri

aguero93:20 said:
Citizen in Pakistan said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
no, they cannot be tried for the same offence twice, if they have been found not guilty the first time that's it. Even if this principle held true for football (which it doesn't) the fact is Mbiwa was found "guilty" by Jones and punished, so all that's happening is that "sentence" would be looked at and reviewed, which happens all the time in the legal system.

The principle states that an offender cannot be punished twice for the same offence or anyother offence based on similar facts
The exception to this rule is new facts which would suggest otherwise,now as in this case he was given a yellow for the tackle( which should have been red) so the verdict was yellow,now the only way this could have been overturned as red if mbiwa commited another offence in the process which didn't came to the knowledge of the ref at that time
but he's not getting two yellow cards if they review it is he? he's getting the yellow upgraded to a red, by a court with higher authority, which is in no way a violation of double jeopardy and has countless precedents.

Yes he commited two fouls which both could have been seperate yellows but the ref saw both the tackles and termed it as a single yellow,whether he was right in his assesment or not is another topic of conversation,but the bottom line is for the whole incident he gave a yellow which could only b reviewd like I said before if some other fact comes to knowledge
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Eccles Blue said:
Bobby Taylor's Pub Team said:
blueparrot said:
The picture in the MEN says he was leaving after a scan, surely if it was that bad he would have been whisked of to a specialist or a surgeon, not walking out crutches or no crutches.

He'll have to wait a couple of weeks for his GP to receive the scan, then go on the waiting list once he finally gets a GP appointment a week or so later.

God only knows how long he'll be out.

That's if they don't lose the scan or he doesn't ring the GP to check that it is back because the GP will never ring him!!
he'll be alright, you get to skip the waiting lists if 'MP' gets involved so I hear...
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Citizen in Pakistan said:
aguero93:20 said:
Citizen in Pakistan said:
The principle states that an offender cannot be punished twice for the same offence or anyother offence based on similar facts
The exception to this rule is new facts which would suggest otherwise,now as in this case he was given a yellow for the tackle( which should have been red) so the verdict was yellow,now the only way this could have been overturned as red if mbiwa commited another offence in the process which didn't came to the knowledge of the ref at that time
but he's not getting two yellow cards if they review it is he? he's getting the yellow upgraded to a red, by a court with higher authority, which is in no way a violation of double jeopardy and has countless precedents.

Yes he commited two fouls which both could have been seperate yellows but the ref saw both the tackles and termed it as a single yellow,whether he was right in his assesment or not is another topic of conversation,but the bottom line is for the whole incident he gave a yellow which could only b reviewd like I said before if some other fact comes to knowledge
you don't seem to understand how this works, the referee isn't the final court, the FA is. If a higher court see a punishment as too lenient or too strict, they can increase or decrease the punishment, it isn't technically a re-trial, so you don't need new evidence. Also, 'other facts coming to knowledge' would be satisfied if the referee sees the video footage after the game (which he doesn't have access to when he makes the original call) and changes his decision, either way DJ isn't relevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.