Player thread: Samir Nasri (2014/15)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Samir Nasri

tolmie's hairdoo said:
Mister Appointment said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Mate, we are never going to agree on Nasri.

Like you, I thought we should have sold Yaya in the summer and that will come back to bite us on the arse quickly enough.

As for Nasri, you can't give him a get-out-of-jail-free card by stating he is in the team to recycle the ball.

That's a central midfielder's job and we have one of them in Fernandinho. See how Fernandinho showed glimpses of breaking the Bayern lines last night, just to allow us to breathe, pretty exciting, I thought.

He is doing Nasri's and Yaya job for them at present.

I agree that the club should have addressed the problem in the market, but Nasri should never have got a new deal.

Based on his inconsistency, inability to play a faster tempo, allied to his price tag and wages, he should have been used as the solution to rectify the weakness in the market and also demonstrated to Milner there was a consistent route to more starts.

Turn your phone on :)

I agree we aren't going to agree on Sami. I think i can handle the criticisms when he has a poor game and his head drops, but the constant stream of invective about his hunger and desire is just nonsense. He loves playing for City and as I've just said, consistently covers more ground and completes more passes than the rest of our midfield. That to me speaks volumes about the unseen work he does.

With regards ball recycling/Fernandinho. Yes Dinho does that job, but Nasri does it in the attacking half of the pitch. His job is to move inside and give Yaya an angle, give Silva an angle, occupy a full back then give Kola the ball.


Selling Toure kills two birds with one stone, and generates the funds to do proper damage with it.

Get a proper replacement for Toure and that then allows Fernandinho to play higher up and recycle in the Nasri areas of the field. He's better at it and also has a great eye for a pass.

That means we can sell Nasri and raise the type of money to get a decent left-sided attacker.

Missing out on di Maria is a mistake of major proportions.

And it could have been avoided if City had the foresight to have got rid of our two biggest flaws.


Totally agree although i think we will still need a big presence in the midfield, like pogba
 
Re: Samir Nasri

pikku said:
Exeter Blue I am here said:
pikku said:
Lol,as to covering more ground,he normally just runs around like a headless chicken and offers nothing defensively,chickens out of tackles,no interceptions,nothing.

Go check out the mileage stats. I don't dispute his ineffectiveness against any top team (his lack of bottle is there for all to see), but it isn't because he isn't trying
Stats are deceiving in this case,just simply runnning around the whole pitch with no intent amounts to no use at all at the end of the day.
Spot on... Look at a freeze frame of most teams when they are in our half . Nasri is jogging back no where near the play. Its great for 'mileage stats' .Then when he's playing one twos he'll give it to Clichy who is running into a dead hole surrounded by defenders but its another 'completed pass'I admire the loyalty of some on here to a City player but to try and justify him as an essential part of our team is deluded. He detract from us unless we are camped in the box of someone like wolves... Just accept he's either good enough but can't be arsed or more likely he's just not good enough. Move on
 
Re: Samir Nasri

onceabluealways said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Mister Appointment said:
Turn your phone on :)

I agree we aren't going to agree on Sami. I think i can handle the criticisms when he has a poor game and his head drops, but the constant stream of invective about his hunger and desire is just nonsense. He loves playing for City and as I've just said, consistently covers more ground and completes more passes than the rest of our midfield. That to me speaks volumes about the unseen work he does.

With regards ball recycling/Fernandinho. Yes Dinho does that job, but Nasri does it in the attacking half of the pitch. His job is to move inside and give Yaya an angle, give Silva an angle, occupy a full back then give Kola the ball.


Selling Toure kills two birds with one stone, and generates the funds to do proper damage with it.

Get a proper replacement for Toure and that then allows Fernandinho to play higher up and recycle in the Nasri areas of the field. He's better at it and also has a great eye for a pass.

That means we can sell Nasri and raise the type of money to get a decent left-sided attacker.

Missing out on di Maria is a mistake of major proportions.

And it could have been avoided if City had the foresight to have got rid of our two biggest flaws.


Totally agree although i think we will still need a big presence in the midfield, like pogba


Just signed a new contract and Juventus know what they have got on their hands, thankfully, United didn't.

He will go for £60m plus and see him going to one of the big two in Spain at some point.

Vidal allows us to tread water for another three or four years, whilst the finances comes back on stream.

We could even have gotten away with not signing Mangala this summer and used the money towards di Maria:(

I am a big fan of the lad at Dortmund, and I mean as well as Reus.

Grosskreutz is a great and willing runner and decent passer.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

nellyonthewing said:
admire the loyalty of some on here to a City player but to try and justify him as an essential part of our team is deluded. He detract from us unless we are camped in the box of someone like wolves...


You realise that Pellegrini and Mancini have both deemed him essential to our team, AND he has played the majority of games (big and small) in both title winning seasons and has scored huge goals in both run ins.

There's a handful of better players out there, but there aren't any for his position in our squad.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Mister Appointment said:
nellyonthewing said:
admire the loyalty of some on here to a City player but to try and justify him as an essential part of our team is deluded. He detract from us unless we are camped in the box of someone like wolves...


You realise that Pellegrini and Mancini have both deemed him essential to our team, AND he has played the majority of games (big and small) in both title winning seasons and has scored huge goals in both run ins.

There's a handful of better players out there, but there aren't any for his position in our squad.


He was out the door under Mancini mate, and you know it!

Fernandinho does his job and some.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

tolmie's hairdoo said:
Mister Appointment said:
nellyonthewing said:
admire the loyalty of some on here to a City player but to try and justify him as an essential part of our team is deluded. He detract from us unless we are camped in the box of someone like wolves...


You realise that Pellegrini and Mancini have both deemed him essential to our team, AND he has played the majority of games (big and small) in both title winning seasons and has scored huge goals in both run ins.

There's a handful of better players out there, but there aren't any for his position in our squad.


He was out the door under Mancini mate, and you know it!

Fernandinho does his job and some.

You miss the point. He was out the door because Mancini wanted to sign another player. There wasn't one in the squad who could do his job in his position. Same still applies.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Mister Appointment said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Mister Appointment said:
You realise that Pellegrini and Mancini have both deemed him essential to our team, AND he has played the majority of games (big and small) in both title winning seasons and has scored huge goals in both run ins.

There's a handful of better players out there, but there aren't any for his position in our squad.


He was out the door under Mancini mate, and you know it!

Fernandinho does his job and some.

You miss the point. He was out the door because Mancini wanted to sign another player. There wasn't one in the squad who could do his job in his position. Same still applies.


He didn't have Fernandinho, did he?

Mancini wanted another player because he knew Nasri could not be relied upon.

There is no requirement for Nasri in this squad if we can use him to find an upgrade.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Sergio<3 said:
Doesn't offer anything at the moment. Would he get in Chelsea's team? I don't think so
Yeah but in all fairness, we're not chelsea. We play different football all together and our tactics are different completely.

Yeh he didnt play amazing last night but we were playing munich away and as a whole, i thought the team played excellent under the circumstances (minus the result obviously) we were just harshly done by.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

tolmie's hairdoo said:
There is no requirement for Nasri in this squad if we can use him to find an upgrade.

Mate, how can you say that? What happens when that player is injured? You've no left sided attacker, just as when Nasri's injured we have to rely on Milner. The point is we need another player, more dynamic than Nasri, to give him competition and yeah, to make him more of a squad player especially in the big games. However if you sell Nasri you're back to the same problem of one player in a key position.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

middleton___blue said:
Sergio<3 said:
Doesn't offer anything at the moment. Would he get in Chelsea's team? I don't think so
Yeah but in all fairness, we're not chelsea. We play different football all together and our tactics are different completely.

Yeh he didnt play amazing last night but we were playing munich away and as a whole, i thought the team played excellent under the circumstances (minus the result obviously) we were just harshly done by.

This is something I don't agree with. Yes it was Bayern away but it was a weakened team for them and we continued to play as we always seem to in the CL. They weren't particularly impressive at any point in the game and we barely troubled them at all. On another day we could have lost badly if not for Joes excellence. We should be aiming for higher than trying to scrape a draw versus an understrength Bayern.

We pretty much sat back and tried to counter them which almost got us a draw but never looked like it would get us a win. Nasri was part of that problem as he never takes responsibility, he will always pass it onto someone else and when Clichy is our left back he is exactly the same so our whole left side contributes nothing offensively. If we had another Navas on the left we would be much more of a threat as he will run at players and commit them.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Mister Appointment said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
There is no requirement for Nasri in this squad if we can use him to find an upgrade.

Mate, how can you say that? What happens when that player is injured? You've no left sided attacker, just as when Nasri's injured we have to rely on Milner. The point is we need another player, more dynamic than Nasri, to give him competition and yeah, to make him more of a squad player especially in the big games. However if you sell Nasri you're back to the same problem of one player in a key position.


Better to have one player for a key position, if they are the right player for the team.

Nasri would not settle for a bit-part role, nor should we let him after what he has cost the club.

He's being shoehorned into the team on his name alone.

Pellegrini is a top manager but they all have their faults.

Milner deserves to be shown there is another route into the team, and that he should sign that new contract.

Nasri's role doesn't actually exist in the wider sense. it's not essential. He is always floating from either side.

Some would call that probing, I would call that hiding.

Never seen a player jam an attacking full back in so many times.

Makes you realise how good Zabaleta really is.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Sergio<3 said:
Doesn't offer anything at the moment. Would he get in Chelsea's team? I don't think so

He wouldn't even get in Arsenal's team, possibly Liverpool as well.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Great last season new contract and now back to his old lazy self would have preferred to keep lopes not as bad as toure though!
 
Re: Samir Nasri

uwe rosler 28 said:
Great last season new contract and now back to his old lazy self would have preferred to keep lopes not as bad as toure though!

His tan is still there. Through the summer( as he was not at the WC) - all I read of him was he was on a beach somewhere - with his bird.
Although the stories were more about his bird than him.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Like Mancini said. He gives about 70-80%. Sometimes little more, sometimes little less.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Damanino said:
Like Mancini said. He gives about 70-80%. Sometimes little more, sometimes little less.

Mancini was spot on. There was a reason that Nasri was all over the press saying how much he was glad that Pellegrini was now the City manager and that is cos Mancini spotted he was a bottle job and constantly underperforming and called him out on it which obviously Nasri the delicate little flower didn't like.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Sell him, got big contract and now back to surfing mode to collect his big wages. He wastes his undoubtedly world class talent by not having enough bottle to show it on the pitch. Sad.

Maybe overreaction but im sick of these underperformances in CL stage, we always fail to impress on the big stage when it matters. Almost always, or always in CL. In PL the record is slightly better. Just something is wrong, has to be mental issue. The squad is obviously good enough to progress to quarter-finals atleast, PSG have done that on first 2 attempts and their squad is imo not better than ours, equal at max.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

Id like him to be given the chance in the number 10 role that he thrived in at arsenal. Silva is great at it but hes still as effective wherever he plays for me, whereas I think we lose a bit with Nasri.
 
Re: Samir Nasri

What is it with this guy?

He has been dogshit all this season since signing a big fat new contract.

When he eventually gets subbed he storms off cursing under his breath with a look of what the fuk did i just do on the pitch....

Bench him and give Jimmy a chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top