jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 5,724
Re: Frank Lampard (staying until end of season confirmed P11
It's ambiguous, as the exact details of his contract with NYCFC are unclear but if they intended to sign him for the forthcoming season starting in March what would have been the point in them registering him from August?
There is little doubt that the whole affair could have been handled better. The most important point in all of this is that there has been no strategic advantage gained by MCFC from the involvement of NYCFC as was the suggestion at the start of the deal.
cleavers said:Its late, and I may have missed something, but I'm not following your post.jaigurugoat said:We did not sign him on loan in August, we signed him as a free agent until the end of the season with a break clause in January which has now been removed. He is effectively starting his loan as of today. So all those who have been frothing at the mouth from August onwards were doing so over absolutely nothing as he only officially became an NYCFC player today.
No doubt there will be even more hysterical reaction in the mainstream media over today's news but I would like to know how MCFC have benefitted from the arrangement from NYCFC. It has not been some elaborate method of avoiding paying his wages as was suggested by some at the start of the deal - funny how this all seams to have gone quiet isn't it? So what else do they have to complain about? Do they really care so much about NYCFC fans that much?
If we (City) signed him as a "free agent" for the whole season, with a "break clause in January", which has now been removed, how is his loan to us from NYCFC starting today ?
It's ambiguous, as the exact details of his contract with NYCFC are unclear but if they intended to sign him for the forthcoming season starting in March what would have been the point in them registering him from August?
There is little doubt that the whole affair could have been handled better. The most important point in all of this is that there has been no strategic advantage gained by MCFC from the involvement of NYCFC as was the suggestion at the start of the deal.