bammy blue said:Really hope he stays, plus is having a Spanish World Cup winning forward not enough of a marque signing for New York City to start the season with......
blueinsa said:moomba said:blueinsa said:The irony being, if he was to go and we missed out on the league, the same foamers would be on here wanting blood and the head of the clown who let him go.
I'm not sure that claim can be backed up by any sort of evidence, and I'm not sure why having a different opinion to yours on how the club should treat this issue classifies anyone as a "foamer".
5 mins on here after any game we drop points or dont win by 5 clear goals or we dont play a certain formation is evidence enough.
He is staying and rightly so.
NY can wait.
The perfect fumble said:[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH-KjH-RBqo[/video]
Neville Kneville said:SWP's back said:Yikes?Dax777 said:If he left now, he is already a premiership and champions league champion. As much as FC wants the best for City,my hat shouldn't happen at the expense of their best player, shirt seller, and media toast. That some City fans can't see this is bewildering! Yikes!!
Oh do fuck off.
This absolutely. What a complete knobhead.
It's more important to this clown, that an as yet non club, with as yet non fans, gets a publicity stunt fully functioning on time, than for City to have the strongest possible chance of wining the title.
That's what it boils down to. Not whether Lampard plays there or not, but whether it's more important for us to win the league, than for them to wait a few weeks before having Lampard play for them.
I'd suggest if their marketing exercise is so important that it can't be put off for just a few weeks, we might as well give them Aguero while we're at it, as them starting their league with maximum publicity, is obviously more important than us winning ours.
Perhaps they should buy us ?
Bokonon said:Neville Kneville said:SWP's back said:Yikes?
Oh do fuck off.
This absolutely. What a complete knobhead.
It's more important to this clown, that an as yet non club, with as yet non fans, gets a publicity stunt fully functioning on time, than for City to have the strongest possible chance of wining the title.
That's what it boils down to. Not whether Lampard plays there or not, but whether it's more important for us to win the league, than for them to wait a few weeks before having Lampard play for them.
I'd suggest if their marketing exercise is so important that it can't be put off for just a few weeks, we might as well give them Aguero while we're at it, as them starting their league with maximum publicity, is obviously more important than us winning ours.
Perhaps they should buy us ?
Cringeworthy stuff if I'm honest. Beginning to feel a bit entitled are we? He is thechnically their player and every club has to start somewhere.