Policing in the UK

[LangleyBlue1970]

Each bulletin on talksport since they were charged today has said ‘the footage appeared to show a policeman stamping on his head’

Why isn’t it saying ‘they were charged after footage emerged that appeared to show them both assaulting police officers’? That’s the charge after all, and they are who have been charged.

The police haven’t been charged with anything.

 

[The blue phantom]

I thought the mother said she’d been on the receiving end of something that happened on the flight? If that can be corroborated, why would she be charged for that?

Someone had racially abused her on the plane. She then pointed them out to her son.

 

[blueinsa]

Someone had racially abused her on the plane. She then pointed them out to her son.

Allegedly, unless you was there and heard it or worse still, you’re happy to run with that narrative because it suits?

 

[Bluemanc100]

I thought the mother said she’d been on the receiving end of something that happened on the flight? If that can be corroborated, why would she be charged for that?

She wouldn’t but (hearsay clearly) Mummy took a dislike to somebody on the plane and her little darlings waded into them on the concourse

Anyway, I’m pleased that justice has prevailed eventually

 

[M18CTID]

She wouldn’t but (hearsay clearly) Mummy took a dislike to somebody on the plane and her little darlings waded into them on the concourse

Anyway, I’m pleased that justice has prevailed eventually

None of us know what actually happened on that flight. The point I was making was that she was never going to get charged - and I see you’ve agreed with me on that - with anything….unless they have evidence she lied, or evidence she told her sons to run riot in the airport and start attacking people and, worse still, kicking off with the police.

Not sure justice has prevailed yet as the trial is still to take place but from what we’ve all seen, it’s absolutely the right decision to charge them.

 

[N1985]

Each bulletin on talksport since they were charged today has said ‘the footage appeared to show a policeman stamping on his head’

Why isn’t it saying ‘they were charged after footage emerged that appeared to show them both assaulting police officers’? That’s the charge after all, and they are who have been charged.

The police haven’t been charged with anything.

Stirs the pot, brings the rage.

The "news" can suck my balls.

It's exactly why I laugh at somebody who is far left or far right. Gullible fucking idiots without the ability to critically think

 

[The blue phantom]

Allegedly, unless you was there and heard it or worse still, you’re happy to run with that narrative because it suits?

I'm just relaying what she had told the police. Something obviously triggered the situation. I know you don't want that to be true but maybe, Just maybe, she was Racially abused.

 

[blueinsa]

I'm just relaying what she had told the police. Something obviously triggered the situation. I know you don't want that to be true but maybe, Just maybe, she was Racially abused.

Possibly and any culprit should be charged and dealt with accordingly.

It wouldn’t excuse the behaviour of her lads though.

 

[BrianW]

Due process takes time, that's what fuckwits don't understand.

There was a woman on TV today, saying that if a woman is raped today it's 2027 before the matter will come to court. She added that's why many women let it drop, as they don't want to be mithered waiting years for justice because of the trauma. Of course, if the bloke pled guilty, it would be much quicker.

That's how it is, and all the talk of 'two-tier' justice is just a load of bollocks put about by wankers like Farage who want to stir up the mob.

 

[The blue phantom]

Possibly and any culprit should be charged and dealt with accordingly.

It wouldn’t excuse the behaviour of her lads though.

I agree