Our monarch and parliament can check one another with power.Two positives can’t make a negative.
Yeah! Right!
It’s why we’re the only major European nation to never have a dictator.
Our monarch and parliament can check one another with power.Two positives can’t make a negative.
Yeah! Right!
It’s spawned a nation ofangry bitter folkgobshites.
I think you are spot on. I am by no means a royalist but she was a giant in English history, the first and only royal to go from the black and white photographs, radio, through to TV and the Internet. All done with very few mistakes or indiscretions, that takes a huge amount of skill in statecraft. The proof of that pudding is how much the rest of her family struggled with the scrutiny and discipline required for the role. She will be an impossible act to follow.I was four when George V1 died and his daughter became queen so she is effectively the only monarch I have known. This is very little on which to base a broad statement of royalism or monarchism. All I can say is that I have been fortunate to have lived for seventy years under the best example of a monarch. It has been very easy to be a royalist under this queen. I fear it will be nowhere near as easy in the years to come.
Beat me to it.Sweet.
The new anthem?
I think Charles II was pretty lucky!If he is King Charles - Charles is not a lucky name for UK monarchs - I recall reading some years ago that he would use Phillip as his monicker - however so long has passed its hard to see how that would work given how we have all known him as Charles all our ( and his ) lives
Shit hits fan....
You’ve honestly lost me here.I suspect many in Ukraine (and russia) would argue otherwise.
That's the problem with "electing" a head of state, they can do what they want and changethings so they can do what they want.
Shit hits fan....