unlikelyfan19 said:
They are so arrogant they dont give a fuck...a win is a win no matter what to them..they need success no matter how they get it,thats why it will hit them 10 fold when whiskey nose goes and the certainty will go with him..
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Rags v Chelsea
- Thread starter lawrenceofbernarbia
- Start date
They are so arrogant they dont give a fuck...a win is a win no matter what to them..they need success no matter how they get it,thats why it will hit them 10 fold when whiskey nose goes and the certainty will go with him..
i8rags
Well-Known Member
Let it be soon.samharris said:unlikelyfan19 said:Do United fans ever start to feel bad? Or just a little dirty watching stuff like that? It's an honest question. It's has to feel like putting in a cheat code for video games, fun at first then it gets so unsatisfying.
They are so arrogant they dont give a fuck...a win is a win no matter what to them..they need success no matter how they get it,thats why it will hit them 10 fold when whiskey nose goes and the certainty will go with him..
lancs blue
Well-Known Member
Danamy said:Castiel said:What is meant to be done against that? Usually scoring 3 legitimate goals and restricting your opposition to 1 is enough to win a game. I told you that we all have to suffer with this referee bullshit. The first one was a con as well, if that had been given against City imagine how this place would explode. Evra clearly jumped into Sturridge, who was shielding the cross.jimharri said:From 3 up, it is.
I'm sorry Castiel but AVB has to take most of the blame today
We all know the second was never a pen but his reluctancy to tighten the game up in midfield when you was 3-0 up cost you.
If he'd brought Romeu on at 3-0 it would probably have ended up 3-6 to the rags, all he did was give the ball away in his own half.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,585
How on god's earth did Malouda not get taken off?
He must have touched the ball twice in the second half, utterly woeful.
AVB is a fucking idiot for letting a 3 goal lead slip, should have brought Romeu on immediately after getting the third and could have gone 5 at the back.
Clueless.
He must have touched the ball twice in the second half, utterly woeful.
AVB is a fucking idiot for letting a 3 goal lead slip, should have brought Romeu on immediately after getting the third and could have gone 5 at the back.
Clueless.
I
I
IH8MUFC
Guest
Taking Sturridge off instead of Malouda or Torres was just like Wenger taking off Chamberlain instead of Walcott. Shocking management.
Freestyler
Well-Known Member
All going wrong at Chelsea, noticed this straight away..
[bigimg]https://p.twimg.com/Ak59fpbCAAAw_v4.jpg[/bigimg]
[bigimg]https://p.twimg.com/Ak59fpbCAAAw_v4.jpg[/bigimg]
Rammy Blue said:How on god's earth did Malouda not get taken off?
He must have touched the ball twice in the second half, utterly woeful.
AVB is a fucking idiot for letting a 3 goal lead slip, should have brought Romeu on immediately after getting the third and could have gone 5 at the back.
Clueless.
Evra on a card and sturridge running him ragged...poor decision to take him off.
His only option to do that was Romeu. I don't think he expected the penalty situation to cost us. It isn't wise to shut up shop against United with almost a whole half of football to be played. My only complaint for him was leaving Malouda on and taking Sturridge off. He didn't start Romeu because he wanted to do a 4231 and play Mata in the hole, for the first time this season, and Malouda is all we have to play on the left at the moment with injuries and ACON. I'm sure his plan was to get a lead and revert to the 433 with Romeu holding, then the penalties happened.Danamy said:Castiel said:What is meant to be done against that? Usually scoring 3 legitimate goals and restricting your opposition to 1 is enough to win a game. I told you that we all have to suffer with this referee bullshit. The first one was a con as well, if that had been given against City imagine how this place would explode. Evra clearly jumped into Sturridge, who was shielding the cross.jimharri said:From 3 up, it is.
I'm sorry Castiel but AVB has to take most of the blame today
We all know the second was never a pen but his reluctancy to tighten the game up in midfield when you was 3-0 up cost you.
jimharri
Moderator
Also, Essien was spent after an hour. He should have been subbed as well.samharris said:Rammy Blue said:How on god's earth did Malouda not get taken off?
He must have touched the ball twice in the second half, utterly woeful.
AVB is a fucking idiot for letting a 3 goal lead slip, should have brought Romeu on immediately after getting the third and could have gone 5 at the back.
Clueless.
Evra on a card and sturridge running him ragged...poor decision to take him off.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,585
samharris said:Rammy Blue said:How on god's earth did Malouda not get taken off?
He must have touched the ball twice in the second half, utterly woeful.
AVB is a fucking idiot for letting a 3 goal lead slip, should have brought Romeu on immediately after getting the third and could have gone 5 at the back.
Clueless.
Evra on a card and sturridge running him ragged...poor decision to take him off.
Maybe AVB fancies getting the sack and a nice payoff from Roman?
If the owner was there today, cameras didn't show him as far as I'm aware, he won't have been overly impressed....