Hungarian blue
Well-Known Member
I'm a bit undecided on him still, but for a fee about 25-30m he would be quite a risk worth it really.
Blue warrior said:RandomJ said:pudge said:Tolmie did say today that the aforementioned £50m bid was for Sterling, however, I imagine with such a public leak of his intentions that the club will be pulling the string back on that carrot a tad.
I sure hope so but then this is City we're talking about. Only we would pay £50 million for a player who is practically standing outside Anfield with his suitcase packed.
Problem is he's only on £35K per week so not costing them the earth they can easily keep him, If city really do want him we will have to cough up 45m I reckon.
waspish said:why pay 50m when no other club will?
God said:From RAWK
"Sell him for 50m and hopefully he rips his hamstring and loses his only top attribute."
stony said:Oh my fucking days. What world do some of these twats live in?
I hope the top clubs get together and agree collectively to ignore him.
SomeLurkerGuy said:waspish said:why pay 50m when no other club will?
Because he's worth £50m to us. Not every club necessarily needs to sign top quality youth/pace/homegrown players/all of the above as much as we do. Unfortunately we do and Sterling just happens to check every box.
I would happily pay the money.
I don't think we would. We've sold players in the past (SWP) and I don't remember there being a collective smear campaign against their characters, starting with the club's hierarchy. Jamie Carragher's comments were laughable and the fans are just taking their lead from the large number of bitters in/from the club itself.BlueDeadHead said:God said:From RAWK
"Sell him for 50m and hopefully he rips his hamstring and loses his only top attribute."
We would be saying the same thing if one of our top academy products was being poached. It sucks to be a selling club.