Sir peace frog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,534
- Location
- stalking the canals and rivers
- Team supported
- Manchester City Football Club
ahahhahaha,very sharp, hat off and doffedYou're obviously the latter mate. No offence ;)
ahahhahaha,very sharp, hat off and doffedYou're obviously the latter mate. No offence ;)
ban the fucker for wummingOur forum leader was crowned itk in the know on Saturday when he broke the delph news and today has been crowned kfa know fuck all calling the medical wrong .lol
Ok well in terms of backing up my point how many games have they played, and how much time do they have to develop in the first team?
Our forum leader was crowned itk in the know on Saturday when he broke the delph news and today has been crowned kfa know fuck all calling the medical wrong .lol
Should take some lessons from tolmie !!Ha, it was a schoolboy error. I should've known better than to mention timelines.
Can't disagree with any of that. Interesting that our model of ownership, which has put money into football, is frowned upon whereas the rags model, which sees money going to the banks in debt repayment, is thought to be good. Insane.Of course it does, but it's not kept within football, which means clubs end up back at square one financially, as the TV money increases, it's goes right through to players, and the clubs are still skint!
At least with transfers, it filters through the system, so our 50m on Sterling will go to Liverpool and QPR, then on to other clubs via transfers etc. Sadly agents will be sucking their percentage out with every transaction.
I think Isco and Cazorla might have something to say about the idea that Pellegrini can't develop young players.
Funny seeing scousers still bending over backwards to try and find the negatives in this deal. Well the stupid ones anyway. The smart ones are turning their eyes to FSG and asking why they are selling their best players, and more importantly why their best players are so desperate to get the fuck out of dodge.