Barcon
Well-Known Member
That was my point in that he might then fetch more than Mane. I just can't see it happening though.What about if he moves within the prem? Shock Chelsea move for example?
That was my point in that he might then fetch more than Mane. I just can't see it happening though.What about if he moves within the prem? Shock Chelsea move for example?
He did it with Sancho for example. Sancho wouldn't sign a contract so was frozen out of the squad and sold.
Sane wasn't in the final year of his contract?
Garcia I will never understand but by all accounts Pep felt like we had no other option so had to play him.
With Sterling we have several others who can play so Pep could definitely just bench him.
Of course not, but that's normally referred to as an extensionnothing to stop us paying the signing on fee and keeping him.
No Milner was not a **** for leaving on a free as he was entitled to do. He became a **** when he fully bought into the cult and bad mouthed City.The sentiment around milner leaving on a free and sterling leaving on a free is night and day.
Milner was a ****
Sterling is a good servant.
Let's not try to rewrite history, Sane was frozen out of the team.
No Milner was not a **** for leaving on a free as he was entitled to do. He became a **** when he fully bought into the cult and bad mouthed City.
I wouldn’t expect Sterling to do the same.
Correct he did his cruciate in the Charity Sheild. If it weren't for that year long injury we may well have sold him sooner and got more brass for him.No he wasnt. He wasn't playing long before the whole bayern thing. And then he was out inured for a year. Let's not reqrite history indeed.
No Milner was not a **** for leaving on a free as he was entitled to do. He became a **** when he fully bought into the cult and bad mouthed City.
I wouldn’t expect Sterling to do the same.
No we bought him to provide a service. He has.
Of course not, but that's normally referred to as an extension