Ref Watch City Games - 2023/24

Regarding Friday night, I was in the ground and appreciate there can be an element of group norming, but I honestly thought Tierney was pretty fucking shite and gave spurs everything. We had most of the possession, they got most of the free kicks. As usual
Absolutely spot on regarding Tierney mate, just a standard game from him when he’s refereeing us. Total lack of consistency shown towards both teams.

The only positive was that Rodri somehow kept his composure and didn’t walk into a booking.
 
Absolutely spot on regarding Tierney mate, just a standard game from him when he’s refereeing us. Total lack of consistency shown towards both teams.

The only positive was that Rodri somehow kept his composure and didn’t walk into a booking.
So we had 60% possession but committed 2/3 of the fouls? We are dirty cunts when in possession aren’t we?
 
Absolutely spot on regarding Tierney mate, just a standard game from him when he’s refereeing us. Total lack of consistency shown towards both teams.

The only positive was that Rodri somehow kept his composure and didn’t walk into a booking.
Rodri played within himself a bit and wasn't his full-blooded self which is probably why he didn't get a booking.

Agreed on Tierney. He is probably one of the least consistent referees where we are concerned.
 
So we had 60% possession but committed 2/3 of the fouls? We are dirty cunts when in possession aren’t we?
Haha, we are intense to win the ball back quickly and so give away more fouls than the average team (I do think we could be more cunning in some situations as we get a few unnecessary yellows but it’s clear that’s what pep wants and the players follow his instructions).

But, as we saw on Friday it’s not to the ratio of us conceding 2 fouls to the oppositions 1. Tierney was woeful, Richarlison got away with all sorts all night, we got punished for levels of contact that were allowed by Spurs players. And that model of refereeing happens all too often, especially in a tight game.
 
Rodri played within himself a bit and wasn't his full-blooded self which is probably why he didn't get a booking.

Agreed on Tierney. He is probably one of the least consistent referees where we are concerned.
I liked that about Rodri on Friday, there were a couple of decisions against him where he put his hands in his head with an ‘I don’t believe it look’ towards the ref and was there one reaction where I thought he was losing it and about to chop a spurs player quickly after another poor decision (or non decision) but it didn’t quite happen.

Rodri is a good example this season. Other than the red card which was crazy, I’d say at least 2-3 of his bookings have been soft in the circumstances. I’m hoping to see him tread a fine line to make sure he’s available for as many key games coming up.
 
On that point, it’s whether the player in an offside position would have been able to receive the ball had he not been offside to start with, otherwise he’s gained an advantage.
That’s true, I do think however that the occasions where an advantage occurs in these circumstances would, I think be quite rare, and probably quite obvious. If the referee’s first consideration was to consider whether an advantage had been gained, with notes for guidance, then I think we would have more appropriate decisions. The sort of situation where I would see there would be an advantage would be where a player previously in a central offside position retreats to receive the ball centrally and the only opponent playing him onside is out by the touchline with no chance of challenging. Referee’s have to make this sort of decision with respect to DOGSO at present.
 
That’s true, I do think however that the occasions where an advantage occurs in these circumstances would, I think be quite rare, and probably quite obvious. If the referee’s first consideration was to consider whether an advantage had been gained, with notes for guidance, then I think we would have more appropriate decisions. The sort of situation where I would see there would be an advantage would be where a player previously in a central offside position retreats to receive the ball centrally and the only opponent playing him onside is out by the touchline with no chance of challenging. Referee’s have to make this sort of decision with respect to DOGSO at present.

Depends how much you view just retention of possession an advantage too or giving teams an easy way to get the ball up the pitch. Were they to get rid of it, it’d change completely how defenders would have to act as well as how teams attack - they’d be hitting it long and high and going after second balls constantly.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.