Again tbf, I am not surprised they don't come on this thread to justify what is clearly a minority opinion and always in an emotional debate after games. Personally, I would stay away, so kudos to them for contributing.
If I can defend referees a little, they have a very difficult job in increasingly difficult circumstances and are working for an organisation that does absolutely nothing to help their reputations at all. In fact, everything they do just seems to increase the levels of suspicion and distrust of referees. And, at the end of the day, they have all been promoted through the divisions, I suppose. They haven't all become incompetent when they get to the PL.
That said, I find it absolutely unbelievable that people can think an organisation that has spent 15 years trying to stop City from developing with new rules, investigations and, now, ill-advised allegations of fraud and deceit isn't capable of manipulating game results to maintain the value of its product. How can anyone expect the PL to act with sporting integrity on the pitch when they can't operate with organisational integrity off it?