lol! If the roles were reversed there would be 17 pages already claiming it was ‘bent’ for not giving it.Your earlier trolling post and the last bit of this second one.
lol! If the roles were reversed there would be 17 pages already claiming it was ‘bent’ for not giving it.Your earlier trolling post and the last bit of this second one.
And trolling like yours would still be dealt with.lol! If the roles were reversed there would be 17 pages already claiming it was ‘bent’ for not giving it.
What is there to delete? This thread is rampant week after week with conspiracy theories about refs being ‘bent’, so when they don’t give a blatant penalty, at Anfield of all places, that should be highlighted.And trolling like yours would still be dealt with.
I’ll post a screenshot before you delete.
Then highlight it constructively, rather than trolling, which is exactly what you were doing with your initial post. No reasonable observer would interpret it as anything else.What is there to delete? This thread is rampant week after week with conspiracy theories about refs being ‘bent’, so when they don’t give a blatant penalty, at Anfield of all places, that should be highlighted.
Got it Spot on - was a blatant penalty from Ederson, didn’t buy their theatrics around the penalty area and even ignored the most blatant penalty you’ll ever see in the last seconds.
So you’re accepting that indeed it was a penalty at the end?Then highlight it constructively, rather than trolling, which is exactly what you were doing with your initial post. No reasonable observer would interpret it as anything else.
No, I have done nothing of the sort.So you’re accepting that indeed it was a penalty at the end?