He saw it just fine, everyone saw it. The player himself admitted to it. It's as blatant and stonewall as you will ever see.
Noone in that stadium missed it, refs included. It wasn't given because there's a clear agenda and it worked.
Imagine if this would have been the a foul on the rags.
Do you have some kind of telepathic power that read or sense another person's thoughts? Yes It could be incompetence and it can also be a corrupt referee decision, that's why City needs to investigate this.
To be fair, @franksinatra only commented after he was invited to comment. But you do have a habit of answering every single comment made back to you. You don't need to do this!
To be honest frank I prefer it when the refs are competent. At least that way I know when they're cheating.No need to be telepathic just a response to slicky who mused whether it was incompetent or blatant cheating. I responded I thought it was incompetent. Please keep up.
And how was Wanyama allowed to dive on the ball and handle it in the first half without being booked?WHY was the Spuds player NOT booked for putting the ball in the net after the whistle had gone??????
How come Spuds could take a fee kick for offside in our half????
How could Spuds take a free kick for an offence that took place near the corner flag form outside the 18 yard box???
To be honest frank I prefer it when the refs are competent. At least that way I know when they're cheating.