Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
20%Fair play to Saints standing there ground against the dippers for Lavia, I was wondering whether we have a sell on clause.
20%Fair play to Saints standing there ground against the dippers for Lavia, I was wondering whether we have a sell on clause.
of course it wouldn't, that'd be ridiculousDoes anyone know if Loserpool buy Lavia, will the buyback clause still exist?
Usually when City sell academy players it turns out to be the right decision, in the sense that they don't turn out to be players good enough for our first team. Maybe Lavia will be the exception but in general we get it right. Plus we don't know whether these young players are desperate for regular football?Its a huge shame we chose to overlook two very decent,potentially excellent,academy products in favour of Philips.Both would have been far more useful last season.
The buy back is £40m so in essence 20% off the £50m they are asking liverpool forStupid question, if we buy him back, then we get 20% back due to sell on clause?
Not if it's this summer as it only activates in 2024.Stupid question, if we buy him back, then we get 20% back due to sell on clause?
Pretty sure only the buy back is next season.Not if it's this summer as it only activates in 2024.
city must be looking and see what brighton want for CM and thought well prices arent going to come downAs much as it would pain me to see Lavia go to Liverpool, I genuinely believe he's being overrated on his potential more than what he really is at the moment. I don't think he's near ready to regularly feature in a top 4 (or 5) side - in a few years yes, but not right now. But, what the hell do I know