DenisLawBackHeel74
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 11,446
adrianr said:BlueDejong said:http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/manchester-city-dropped-ross-barkley-4095928
Manchester City dropped Ross Barkley pursuit after Everton demanded £50MILLION for youngster
Aug 23, 2014 22:30 By Simon Mullock
City were prepared to pay £30million plus bonuses but were stunned by the Goodison outfit's valuation of a player with fewer than 30 top-flight starts
Manchester City ditched a plan to sign Ross Barkley after being told it would take a bid of more than £50million to tempt Everton to sell.
Sunday Mirror revealed in July that Manuel Pellegrini had the England midfielder in his sights after a sensational performance against City towards the end of last season.
But Etihad officials were stunned to learn of Everton’s sky-high valuation of a player who has made less than 30 Premier League starts.
The fee would have smashed the record paid for an English player when Liverpool handed Newcastle £35m for Andy Carroll.
City were willing to go to £30m – and were offering additional payments should Barkley realise his huge potential.
A City insider said: “Barkley was seen as one of the few homegrown English players in the world game who would improve the squad.”
Barkley, 20, has now secured his Goodison future by signing a new four-year deal.
But he has been sidelined for the first 10 weeks of the new season by torn knee ligaments.
With all due respect to Everton, if I were Barkley I'd be pretty unhappy about that. A genuine 50 million valuation is going to seriously jeopardize his chances of playing for a top club with FFPR now in full swing. 30 million plus bonuses is a big gamble as it is, and now imagine if his knee starts giving him long term grief? May need to get comfy over there.
I agree. I think that article is bullshit though, city insider my arse....