NoDidn't the powers that be make an agreement with Ukraine that if they agree to give up their nukes that we'd treat them as if they were a NATO member?
A lot of people seem keen to make this point but I wonder how relevant it is. We happily talk about the UK, the Netherlands, and the US without delegitimising their existence as sovereign states.It is Ukraine. Not The Ukraine.
Not aimed at just you, and apologies for what seems a petty and meaningless remark. It isn't. It is pretty fucking significant, particularly at this point when it's entire sovereignty and identity is being fannied about with.
So they both have "The" before them? I never said it doesn't matter I said that it wasn't unusual.
Fancy a holiday in the Sudan after this shenanigans to refuel the old batteries.
Doesn't phase me any of that mate, grew up on the internet seen it all unfortunately.
Putin on Russian state TV?
Belarus is a puppet state aiding and abetting Putin
Are you going to Sudan or South Sudan?
Your three examples are countries that consist of multiple entities. Ukraine is a single entity that grammatically doesn't need a "The".A lot of people seem keen to make this point but I wonder how relevant it is. We happily talk about the UK, the Netherlands, and the US without delegitimising their existence as sovereign states.
I think one of the African nations uniquely officially has ‘The’ at the start of its title in a territorial sense (referring to the river). Can’t remember which one, The Gambia, The Congo, maybe.
Many other nations proudly have ‘The’ at the beginning in their official names, although generally in a non-territorial sense. Our own ‘The United Kingdom of…’ and various others: ‘The people’s democratic…’ etc.