BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 36,259
It's likely untrue, but some would rather take twitter news than verified news
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Thread starter feedmpenzaandhewillscore
- Start date
It's likely untrue, but some would rather take twitter news than verified news
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
I wouldn’t take this as factual information and you shouldn’t either.
grunge
Well-Known Member
B-2 is the original stealth bomber. Lots of reports one landed in Poland. Nothing outside of that tweet mentions anything about nukes tho.Heard about this but was dubious,could be true.
What made me dubious,and I maybe completely wrong.
So if anyone wants to correct me,as always,please do....no offence will be taken....I'm learning myself.
My understanding is....they could fly one of these to the Kremlin,undetected.....it's a Stealth Bomber,right?????
Slava Ukraini.
gaz76
Well-Known Member
When I say "no one seems to care" I mean hardly anyone is talking about it, I expect the masses to have fuck all influence on it, but might have thought the general public would be talking about it, which in my experience doesn't seem to be the case at all.What exactly do you expect the masses to do to influence it? We already oppose the invasion, wish for Russia to remove it's invading forces, are giving the Ukrainians support.
Running around screaming about it won't do anything productive. We must place our faith in the Ukrainian forces (who have done a stellar job thus far) in ending this. What's your alternative?
Yeah,I seen photos of one landing in Poland,just wasn't sure,so dint post.B-2 is the original stealth bomber. Lots of reports one landed in Poland. Nothing outside of that tweet mentions anything else mentioning nukes.
My thinking is,the US won't send ATACMS because of the range(unless they done it on the sly),but would send a long range Stealth Bomber at a cost of about £700m each,plus the cost of the payload.
Slava Ukraini.
grunge
Well-Known Member
Yeah,I seen photos of one landing in Poland,just wasn't sure,so dint post.
My thinking is,the US won't send ATACMS because of the range(unless they done it on the sly),but would send a long range Stealth Bomber at a cost of about £700m each,plus the cost of the payload.
Slava Ukraini.
This will just be bolstering Poland being a NATO country. A NATO move rather than for Ukraine its self.
Scottyboi
Well-Known Member
grunge
Well-Known Member
Got links to the original vid? I did search but didn't find it.Vid from 2 years ago and fake news brah
Edit: Found. was landing in the UK
Metal Biker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 21,303
- Team supported
- Manchester City (and McLaren F1)
Eeehh, kind... of. It's not strictly a 'stealth' bomber, in that it cannot be detected at all. It's harder to detect by other nations with limited radar/satellites etc allowing it to approach enemy airspace undetected, whereas a nation like the UK with advanced satellites etc would. It's also big so can carry a big payload and travels far.Heard about this but was dubious,could be true.
What made me dubious,and I maybe completely wrong.
So if anyone wants to correct me,as always,please do....no offence will be taken....I'm learning myself.
My understanding is....they could fly one of these to the Kremlin,undetected.....it's a Stealth Bomber,right?????
Slava Ukraini.
Scottyboi
Well-Known Member
Got links to the original vid? I did search but didn't find it.
Was linked by a Chinese bot account, got to try find it now was on my PC now I'm on my phone, but it was defo an old vid.